Whats your best...

[StackBundles]

i was wondering whats your best LW registry strategies on even chances if you care to share...

[vile]

3LL vers.3FL

[warrior]

3LL vers.3FL

whats fl

[Drazen]

Ah warrior my friend, mr. vile is enigma man, didn't you realized by now?


And he already gave answer to this question much before it will be asked, because i think he predicted this


But where?   


Am i the only one who likes/know to solve his puzzles? 



Regards




Drazen

[warrior]

Not much into puzzles, been there done that put IT on the table kind of guy.

[Drazen]

Many of them excatly like that dear warrior...


Preferably put sometihing very worthable, like g r a i l or something..


Maybe that way his puzzles should have higher meaning??


Hm.. wouldnt know


But try this one, it is not hard so much


Regards




Drazen

[warrior]

No thanks.

[Robeenhuut]

No thanks.

Probably FTL

[Skakus]

The Chompskyhonk.

[Paja]

Some things can only be seen by converting your results into WL.


I'm abusing certain bet selection in my tests. Straight 10 step progression, betting every spin.
Never seen more than 9L in 2000 spins so far. Oh, and it's a bet on a little less than 18 numbers.


I owe my humble knowledge about this bet exclusive to two roulette experts on this thread - Mr. Enigma and his disciple. When they say "test" you should ask "how much".


3LL vs. 3FL - 3 last vs. 3 furthest ? 18 vs. 18? 

[TwoCatSam]

Paja

Perhaps you could direct us to one of Enegma's posts.  Was he/she a friend of Gamlet's? 

Sam

[Robeenhuut]

Paja

Perhaps you could direct us to one of Enegma's posts.  Was he/she a friend of Gamlet's? 

Sam

Hola Sam

I tried 2 follow thread about Gamlet theories 2 no avail.  Lots of theory not much substance.
When  you thought you grasped some of  it  there was more information coming.
From a presentation point of view it tells me that the author either was not sure about his presentation skills - totally understandable because some of us dont speak english that well or he constantly changed the rules because he was not so sure about his method.
Take G.U.T.  You spent some time testing it...I followed  all possible threads very closely but this was a perfect example of a system that apparently only a author could play successfully.
I dont expect Holy Grail here 2 be played on an automatic pilot but if there are 2 many options as 2 your next bet it just becomes a guessing game in my opinion.
Plus long term testings results were not that great.

Regards

[TwoCatSam]

Rob

I will speak to the G.U.T. 

While there is no logical/mathematical reason crossings should occur when they do, the lines "seem" to "want" to cross.  I'll be the first to say this is silly as hell, but there it is.

Now, my problem, as winkle stated, is mind control or sticking to the game plan.

It is hard for me to walk away a loser as I hate losing a session.  It is hard for me to walk away a winner as I hate leaving a winning session.  So--I never leave!!  'Till I'm broke.

The original sector program Gamlet presented does work, in my opinion.  KonFuSed wrote a program for it, but it only tracks one sector.  It should track an infinite number of sectors.

Finally, the G.U.T. is the mostest funnest system I ever played.  A bit tiring as one must concentrate, but lots of fun.  Quite easy to go up 50 in a session.

I am working to develop the "eternal crossing", a crossing that appears constantly.

Sam

[Robeenhuut]

Rob

I will speak to the G.U.T. 

While there is no logical/mathematical reason crossings should occur when they do, the lines "seem" to "want" to cross.  I'll be the first to say this is silly as hell, but there it is.

Now, my problem, as winkle stated, is mind control or sticking to the game plan.

It is hard for me to walk away a loser as I hate losing a session.  It is hard for me to walk away a winner as I hate leaving a winning session.  So--I never leave!!  'Till I'm broke.

The original sector program Gamlet presented does work, in my opinion.  KonFuSed wrote a program for it, but it only tracks one sector.  It should track an infinite number of sectors.

Finally, the G.U.T. is the mostest funnest system I ever played.  A bit tiring as one must concentrate, but lots of fun.  Quite easy to go up 50 in a session.

I am working to develop the "eternal crossing", a crossing that appears constantly.

Sam

Hello Sam

Im bit sceptical because all sector oriented systems failed.  Tracking is not d problem 4 me although its bit of boring.  I have done bit of testing on both - GUT n Gamlet and got mixed results. Definitely i would not discard them right away like most whats out there. As 2 logic behind it hehe just forget about it. If something works in d long run you dont question it.  What i noticed that in sessions you play your winning sessions give you higher profit than loses in your losing sessions if you play set number of spins.  Then it comes down 2 choosing yr stop loss and win goal. I guess bit of luck would help 2 

Regards

[Paja]

Paja

Perhaps you could direct us to one of Enegma's posts.  Was he/she a friend of Gamlet's? 

Sam

Hello Mr. Sam. When mentioning Enigma I was referring to Mr. Vile because of his puzzle(s).


It seems to me that Mr. Vile and Mr. Drazen share same roulette approach as Mr. Flatino, who I consider to be a real pro. I love his 4 number crossings. Great way for tracking dozens and columns at the same time.


I was testing variation of his Promised constant winning bet from the topic of the same name.  10 step progression did crash in 25th 100 spin session but still leaving around +4000 units of profit. This was only a WL test.


I will soon revisit that topic and test some variations.


Btw, I love BV videos. You should do TRILOGY next, with commentary!