***C0DE 20***

[Johnlegend]

I'm sorry, but I consider this thread ridicolous.
Only Vile and Twocatsam have a realistic and logical approach.
John Legend wrote:..."In math you wknow what will happen,in Roulette you don't...."
I have worked for several years ,as math and statistic consultant,in a very very well known Casino in Europe.
Reading this thread I'm afraid that Casino managers can't stop laughing........
Can I answer in a very humble way what's the education of John Legend?
Ph.D,engineer,phisician or other?

So what exactly are you saying. You know what will happen in roulette do you Berret? Come on explain yourself. And we will see who is laughing at who.

[Maui13]

STOP, STOP STOP STOP!!!


Bunch of men going on like kids!


Guys - this is like sport...hobbies...or anything else compared... I like rugby....someone else likes soccer. If I don't like soccer I don't bad mouth it....I just prefer rugby.


Why if you guys don't like matrix methods badmouth it? If you don't like it carry on liking red/black  ...splits.... or what ever tickles your fanny!


Just STOP being negative cows on posts that might give someone insight to something that they can develop and turn into something useful.


Let results speak!


Regards,
M

[Johnlegend]

Splits are from 8/12 to 17/3 (extremes) to 14/6 15/5 16/4 usualy (around 1.000 spins sets), so we can try to play the safer way - wait for 4 consecutive non-maches (not rare) and then bet flat 16 times until the end of 20 spins cycle (finish session before if we get say 4 matches earlier).

Congratulations Cofi, for the way you have come back with some very good and positive ideas and comments on CODE20 played the right way. I will post up the rule meth later after my Tea. But you are spot on with the Trigger. And to those who say Triggers make no difference. You simply do not get the whole point of a set frame. You can't divorce your mind from pure math. And until you can losing and negative thinking will be all you ever know and have.

The Triggers job is damage limitation. In the event random has reached the extreme we don't want . 17/3 or 18/2 We will take a loss. But we will take less of a loss than had we just randomly entered the cycle and hoped for the best. Does that register?? And when random is doing an average performance we will quickly go into profit. And more likely than not lock the game before we complete it. Which is what I want as often as possible.

Only a fool wants to go to war with random. Your goal should ALWAYS be short play then away. Whether the method is level stakes or progressive. You will yield better results by spending less time on the wheel. This is a lesson ALL should have already learnt. And it never ceases to amaze me how many people don't realize this.

[Maui13]

Dear Maui, it is not my personal unfavavouring here. I just said that all is based on wrong facts. That is all. JL says it is percentage method. Well that percentages are wrong calculated, that is what i am saying. And that is a mathematical fact. So how can something work if it is based on non workable facts?


And about speed of light and Einstein, you are the one who is wrong my friend. I know what you are reffering to.
That was mistake. Wrong calculations due to mechanical malfunction of some measuring devices in CERN-s Large hadron collider.


They announced that as a fallacy of a century, but when they noticed malfunction, and did re-tests guess what, einstein was right again


Over and out for me


Cheers


Drazen

Drazen, I JUST PROVED MY POINT - I can write whatever I want....but you're running a race like a horse. Your eye flaps are on, and you don't except sh!t but your opinion. Fact of the matter is if the "godfather" of maths/science/physics wrote laws 100 years back, our technology, perception, skills grow daily, there are many laws that are being proved wrong, but yet, you stick to your guns, instead, give benefit the doubt.


All I'm saying is - stop breaking down other people's worlds...see possibilities, dream. Roulette can be beaten - believe that...and you'll start creative and postitive thinking. Living negative only breaks dreams! This was meant in a very + and nice manner. So I hope you don't take it in the wrong way! 


Regards,
M