***C0DE 20***

[atlantis]

JL well done!

About 13.500 bets tested with 150.000 real wheel spins flat bet and random entry point between the 20 spin frames.

[attachimg=1]

Wow - I like the upward trend on that graph! -  Nice result Rolletti.
Very encouraging, I'd say.

A.

[vile]

JL well done!

About 13.500 bets tested with 150.000 real wheel spins flat bet and random entry point between the 20 spin frames.

[attachimg=1]

You heard ol Sam...only videos.
That graph means nothing,to me anyhow.

[Robeenhuut]

Anybody has a strike rate here?  And charts with lots of spins never convinced anybody here 

[Rolletti]

come on vile, dont be that ignorant!

150.000 spins. That is 1 year every day whole day play in B&M CASINO. How to record that on video.

Video may be one session with 5 games.

THAT IS NOTHING.

[Johnlegend]

Anybody has a strike rate here?  And charts with lots of spins never convinced anybody here 

Robeenhuut until people like you, Sam and Vile come to the realization that the ONLY person who can convince YOU. Is YOU. You will never progress with this game. I will tell you something right now. If a million people told me a method is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

Unitl I prove it to myself its nothing. I can't help anyones lazyness on this forum. You have to master that yourself I am afraid.

[Robeenhuut]

Robeenhuut until people like you, Sam and Vile come to the realization that the ONLY person who can convince YOU. Is YOU. You will never progress with this game. I will tell you something right now. If a million people told me a method is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Unitl I prove it to myself its nothing. I can't help anyones lazyness on this forum. You have to master that yourself I am afraid.

Hello John

Last time i checked u opposed large number graph testing. I dont question your method b4 i do some independent testing.  I just want 2 test it in d fashion u approved b4.  And Roletti - can you run yr test 10 times n give us results. I just want d method 2 be tested in a fair not selective way.
Thats all.  I reserve my judgement until i see results n im more than willing 2 contribute here 


Regards

[Johnlegend]

Hello John

Last time i checked u opposed large number graph testing. I don't question your method b4 i do some independent testing.  I just want 2 test it in d fashion u approved b4.  And Roletti - can you run yr test 10 times n give us results. I just want d method 2 be tested in a fair not selective way.
that's all.  I reserve my judgement until i see results n I'm more than willing 2 contribute here 


Regards

Robeenhuut whether the chart was up or down. The only thing I go by is the results I personally attain. Sure its nice to see an upward streak. But as I said before only one person can convince me a method is worth a hoot. ME. Until that becomes standard thinking inside more peoples brains. It will be 99.9% of players with their heads in the sand. And the tiny minority who know better.

[TwoCatSam]

Everyone notice how he refuses to answer the question.

It's simple:

If you track u v w x and y...why would z be more likely to hit?

If something won't work, talking of percentages is a non-starter.

It's like the used car salesman talking to a victim:  Why, we lose about $100.00 per car on every sale.

Victim:  Dang!!  How do you stay in business?

Salesman:  Volume, my boy!!  It's all about volume!!

Without question my character and motives, John, please answer the question.

Sam

[vile]

No ignorant my friend,but realistic.
Since all this stuff of JL is no news for us oldies,
like Sam and me,and that all this was tested and retested
few years back and proved as negative,therefore why persuading
ppl.here it works when at the end it will show you real picture as
all other similar approaches did.

[Johnlegend]

Everyone notice how he refuses to answer the question.

It's simple:

If you track u v w x and y...why would z be more likely to hit?

If something won't work, talking of percentages is a non-starter.

It's like the used car salesman talking to a victim:  Why, we lose about $100.00 per car on every sale.

Victim:  Dang!!  How do you stay in business?

Salesman:  Volume, my boy!!  It's all about volume!!

Without question my character and motives, John, please answer the question.

Sam

Why Sam. ITS SIMPLE. Everything will get its turn. You are not asking a question relevant to CODE 20. that's why I don't prioritorize it. You are trying to get a logical anwser for an illogical game. That's your problem. You fail to realize that Maths in general is a non starter when it comes to roulette. In math you know what will happen. In roulette you don't. But the only way you can forge a winning method. Is to identify a common behaviour. That repeats again and again and again. It owes nothing to logical thinking. Only percentage breakdown.

[Drazen]

It is interesting to see that you use some tangible resources like percentages, unlike some myths as hit and run...I don't have slightest intetniton to argue, but my dear John your math is very wrong here, as in all your matrix stuff, EC or dozens/columns..


So how could something work if it is wrong in starting assumption? I don't need tests to prove that.


And that graph like that posted here simply is not possible with this.


Drazen

[Rolletti]

Maybe someone else can code it with other spins.

[amk]

I hope this is my last off topic comment on your thread JL.

I just wanted to say that we can disagree with JL, the approaches don't make sense etc. Lets just look at the evidence we have at hand. JL's results show stats which are not possible through continues play, through his style of play, call it what ever you like, positive results are attained. Can we say 100% we know everything about random (roulette) for that matter mathematics? There are always breakthroughs and advances, new ways off looking at things etc. This is after all how mathematicians make a name for themselves. If they said back in the day, we know everything about math and everything is now predictable we would not have advanced to today's heights.

[Johnlegend]

Maybe someone else can code it with other spins.

Rolletti dont waste your time. They will never change we have to accept that. Just play the method for yourself if you want to. And leave them in the dark.

[Robeenhuut]

Maybe someone else can code it with other spins.

Thx Roletti

I dont think that we need other set of spins.  Was it single zero roulette?

Regards