Dozens or Columns? Do they make a difference?

[tj5656]

Just want to get some ideas on whether any strategy when applied on dozens will produce different results when applied similarly to the columns.

If roulette is indeed random, then there should not be any difference.

Maybe if there is a difference, then we know how not to lose by applying different strategy on dozens and columns separately.

[nitrix]

Mathematically it should not, tho very recently i found something odd and decided I'd look into it later. Funny now as somebody else have (close enough) the same reflexion.

I'm coding a test unit today and bringing feedbacks; the numbers will answer us two at the same time

Alex

[Master_of_pockets]

It s the exact same thing.
Dozens have 12 nums and Columns have 12 nums.

[nitrix]

The disproportion of red and black that lead to another system (the red&low bet I think its called) always facinated me. By itself you wont have any advantage but there must be a situation where it wins.

In fact, today i just found a way to lose more money than I win, using only flat betting. That is extremely valuable for my researchs. Meaning if i do the exact opposite it should result in a profit. The problem is that i have a larger number of places to cover the opposite and due to the complexity of the bet selection, I have no idea how that'd be possible or even simply to calculate in real time.

But with computers today, it shouldn't be a problem. I'll start my own thread when i have a viable lead, tho I think its not far too fetched to put things back in consideration to try new combinations.

[nitrix]

Combinations is the keyword here. If you were to try 2 dozens alone or 2 columns alone, you'd have the same 2/3 chances to win.