Method must study it propely

[StackBundles]

1 6 1 2 4 3 3
              l w
2 3 3 1 4 6 5 3 5
                   l l w
3 5 5 6 6 3 3 2 6 5 4 3 5
                              L L W
4 3 5 4 6 1 3 1
               L L W
3 1 3 6 1 5 4 1
                  L W
5 4 1 1 5 6 2 6
                    w
2 6 1 6 1 2 4 2
                  l w
4 2 1 6 6
           w

[Tomla021]

up one on a loss down one on a win worked nicely,, never played past 3 attempts in another 100 spins---pretty impressed

[Tomla021]

just spins--the 4 diff do come up enough----just testing by hand--100 here /100 there... in casino roulette I hardly ever play more than 60-80 spins...... This may be a nice addition to other plays.......

[GLC]

I'm getting some good vibes from this Vile gent.
His system smells like money to me.  But I have a feeling that you have to play it just like he says.
From one gentleman to another, thanks Mr. Vile!

[Robeenhuut]

I'm getting some good vibes from this Vile gent.
His system smells like money to me.  But I have a feeling that you have to play it just like he says.
From one gentleman to another, thanks Mr. Vile! :LoL:

Yeah.  From my preliminary testing on air ball  it wins very often in first 2 spins. I was only taken once 2 6u betting level n recovered.

Regards

[unre4lbg]

So whats the needed BR to play this

[vile]

--Yes BAYES I got this from FLAT_IN_O,and poasted with his permission

1,
2,
5,
3,
4,
6,.....6 different lines
-----then again
1,
5,
3
4,
6,
2.....6 diff. again in 12 spins

Those above are Fluke Luk. numbers,and this kind of UNIQUE ROLL,you will ever hardly
find in any perm.session.....even thought at so short spins it comeback and won

The fact is that I haven't lost with this as yet.

That's why I call it a METHOD STUDY.....in other words take 5-10 perm.sessions and
see and learn how are lines behaving...in 90% or more they are repeating as a whole,and when
you find as above 2x6 unique lines let me know....that my be when I get  90...LoL...good luck.

[vile]

Somebody want to check this .....  additional spins provided if you want to continue. 


Spins 300+
B & M (Mohegan Sun)
Wheel: 00
High +51
Low -927


Probably playing it wrong .... appreciate the direction.

Here look attachement...played about 50 first spins,don't know wether you are doing
it right o not as don't understand your excel,but you can recheck it up with my score.

[vile]

One thing that the method should have is that if we are on a stage that we have to bet more than 4-4-4 chips we need to cover the zero...never cover zero as at the end you will lose more then in.

I also have 2 questions...
Why are we waiting for 4 def.  lines and not just 3? that's diff.bet that could take you quickly down.
And why are we leaving out the 4th line and not the 1st(last)? this is the most vital question
cause thatway we would be betting 4 lines,24 numb.and we know where it leads too.
An other experiment would be to bet all the 4 def lines....this is more logical to me from the point of the bet selection.....we will have less profits and bigger losses but its all about hit ratio...

my dear MOP,YOUR LOGIC IS UNLOGICAL....TRY ANY/even the one I attached/SESSION WITH BOTH BETS THEN YOU WILL SEE GREAT DIFFERENCE.

[ddarko]

My dear MOF,

You are soooooo sooooooo wrong...try to do it same with B/R,O/E,L/H
with same attachement,then you will see the true.
How come my banc account is much ticker since octobar last year.
Giving you money on the plate and you are spitting nonsense.
Do some study of this...and by the way...there is a real reason why this can't
lose 5-10 in the row like other EC bets,but you will find it I'm sure.
You like to get rich,this is your chance.

Would you please expand on this comment

Thank You

[vile]

THERE IS NO LOGICAL REASON TO WHAT''''

Can't get what you are trying to say...and to mr.Darko,
don't even understand his question.Gentleman I don't
get you....there is a method,there are many sessions,
take it todays Wiesbadens,and simply prove my statements
wrong.I'm really tired of silly and insignificant questions,so please
save me out of this kind of irrelevant communications.

[beretta28]

Fundamental point:Bankroll needed?

[flukey luke]

@m_o_p, you are suggesting this is illogical and then go on to say that you think we should cover the zero.    Now that is illogical!! (except for if the bet called you to play 1,2,3 or 4,5,6 and you could cover (low) or (high) with le partage rules.

The zero is just another number on the wheel. Why not cover '27' for example if you are playing 1,4 and 6 and on the 4th step of the d'alambert. It really makes no sense.

[vile]

Fundamental point:Bankroll needed?

To me it means nothing.
With low BR don't even
go near casino,as you may
lose it on the way there...LO

[vundarosa]

To me it means nothing.
With low BR don't even
go near casino,as you may
lose it on the way there...LO

------------------------

so how much is this low BR?!

i think the question has merit, what BR do you play with?
vundarosa