Method must study it propely

[nottophammer]

Hi Hammer
Jimmie think you have to wait for four unique, then back last 3.Could back 3 unique, but do you back to get the trigger or bet to not get the trigger,(sounds like shakespeare).

Having caught up on the thread over the past few days, this is how I think this should have been played, could be totally wrong though, also, I’m not sure of the betting amounts/progression. Overall its 14 wins & 10 losses, with a good run at the start...

Also, which I didn’t include, as I’m not 100% sure, are you supposed to switch to betting the opposite after 2 losses in a row, and then stop after another 2 consecutive losses, and wait for a trigger i.e. after the 2 con losses after the initial bets of 2,6, & 4, should I have switched to 1, 5, & 3 after the 2 con losses until 2 con losses until another 2 con losses, if this is the case, I think you would have had another 3 wins...

Reading the above, it doesn't look as though I've helped you much, more questions than answers

8-2
34-6
21-4 trigger, 3 DSs from each of the dozens, now bet 2,6, & 4 until 2 consecutive losses
33-6 w
10-2 w
23-4 w
22-4 w
34-6 w
29-5 l
31-6 w


12-2 w
19-4 w
31-6 w
8-2 w
29-5 l
4-1 l, 2 losses in a row wait for another trigger
16-3 another trigger, 3 DSs from each of the dozens, now bet 5, 1, & 3 until 2 consecutive losses
24-4 l
20-4 l 2 losses in a row wait for another trigger
17-3

23-4
35-6
33-6
9-2
5-1
8-2
19-4
13-3
18-3
20-4

13-3
11-2
4-1
33-6
25-5
32-6
33-6
24-4
19-4
34-6

15-3
13-3
12-2
31-6 another trigger, 3 DSs from each of the dozens, now bet 3, 2, & 6 until 2 consecutive losses
23-4 l
32-6 w
25-5 l
23-4 l 2 losses in a row wait for another trigger
35-6
17-3

4-1
30-5 another trigger, now betting 1, 5, & 3
16-3 w
28-5 w
14-3 w
23-4 l
34-6 l
30-5
11-2
34-6

Regards
Jim

[RouletteGhost]

i like this

made a thread about 3 double streets before seeing this

[nottophammer]

reply 435
jimmie does well,seem to remember the 3 d/s's have to be in each doz. did well with this but playing it the betting shops (RNG) it felt like the machine knew what was doing after a week or so, cheap spinning the wheel for £1.20(6 d/s) to get the trigger, would get a zero or to, so do you give .20p each spin to get the trigger,costing money and hope the zeros come.

[RouletteGhost]

what is the bet selection?

how does he decide which double streets to bet on

[JimmieB]

Hi Rich,

Check out the attachment in reply #349 from rayhd...

The attachment shows you wait for 4 unique DS, then best the last 3, if you lose you will have a new set of 3 DSs, bet those, if you lose again (now twice in a row), bet the new 3 DSs you now have, lose again (now three times in a row), stop, wait for a virtual win, and start tracking again for the trigger. The progression is 1,1,3, and you don't bet anymore than 3 times in a row,any win within the 3 bets, stop, and again, start tracking for a new trigger.

I hope this helps

Regards
Jim

[nottophammer]

Hi Jimmie B
A reply yesterday you said 2 b/r's, was this for outside EC bets

[JimmieB]

Hi NTH,

It was on this thread, I think it may work on partner betting....

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=14820.msg125404;topicseen#msg125404

Regards
Jim

[Turner]

One word of warning. Knowing my friend Flat_ino (Vile), something this old...he is not playing anymore.
The reason will be because he ultimatly found issues with it.
The way he played (10 hours a day) would of soak tested this to the extreme. His methods always required a massive bank roll too.
When it went wrong it would of been spectacular loss.
Just some background.

[Chris555p]

I agree in the long run all methods are loosers; However,
with sound money management and being happy with about 10%
profit this method and other double street methods would
allow us to achieving the winning goals.

[Tamino]

One word of warning. Knowing my friend Flat_ino (Vile), something this old...he is not playing anymore.
The reason will be because he ultimatly found issues with it.
The way he played (10 hours a day) would of soak tested this to the extreme. His methods always required a massive bank roll too.
When it went wrong it would of been spectacular loss.
Just some background.

Acording to Flat In O hiimself he lost  100 000 Euro at one visit at the Venice, Italy casino. That wiped  him out.

[nottophammer]

Tam
was it a case of flat started the bet sequence and thought he could keep betting for the win as he had that big b/r.

You'd think he'd be able to beat the string of L's with 100,000 units, 3d/s, longest  i've seen is 7,seen a quote of 11

[RouletteGhost]

Greed took over

[Turner]

Greed took over

I wouldn't use the word greed. Flats ultimate belief in the method perhaps did
He isn't one to get prematurely exited until massive testing indicates.
Perhaps over exposure to the HE or even extremes random can produce. He did (does) play long sessions every day.
The guys a legend. I'm a big fan

[Chris555p]

Hope when the loss of 100,000 â,¬ occurred he had won a lot more than that
before.....
Hope he comes back to roulette stronger as ever.

[Tamino]

He  has won money but a lot of money  was spent on  expensive hotels  plus  travels .

latInO did not specify the system(s)  but  apparently trying to win back losses was his downfall.

About 3-4 years ago  he went to Nice and Monaco but something  happened there which the casinos did not like and he was banned . No details from him.


The above information was posted by FlatInO himself at both  of Steve`s   forum but  under a different user name. Can`  recall  which one

Tamino