Method must study it propely

[unre4lbg]

This played flat bet should produce small profit but will keep losses small, maybe for 3-6 unit grinders like me should work perfectly, looking the spins some of the members here posted,  the ratio is around 50:50 so staying long enough on the wheel will produce a profit.. the thing is how often there will be sessions from hell? Anyone with some feedback on this? I really like the whole idea!

[vile]

------------------------

so how much is this low BR?!

i think the question has merit, what BR do you play with?
vundarosa

Well if I tell you may no believe so I better not.

It is simply ridiculous question,to me anyhow.

Who ever invented that;what BR do you need--
really never play roulette seriously.My unswer.

[vile]

So this is a winner without any logic behind it...

That's what you just said,didn't heard me saying it.
on the contrary...neither that this is HOGRA nor that it can't eventually tank.
What I said that am winning with this for 7 months now.Maybe you won't
be so lucky cause I really didn't reveal all but only the base of the bet that why
it's call a STUDY,and it's up to your willingness to continue to explore further.
Good luck and have a fun while getting rich....LoL

[Drazen]

.Maybe you won't
be so lucky cause I really didn't reveal all but only the base of the bet that why
it's call a STUDY,and it's up to your willingness to continue to explore further.
Good luck and have a fun while getting rich....LoL

I already did. In few seconds i saw your excel. Actualy didn't wanted to say anything about it, but when you already mentioned let it be then.


The time has come then, if you will be this summer in casino Admiral, i belive you will see some young chap playing this who could seem familiar to you.   


Regards


Drazen

[warrior]

Why dont we play lines 245 anytime there is 3 opposite play thos line ,1 up on a loss 1 down on a win,maybe thos will win mor then they lose.what do you think? VILE.

[flukey luke]

4
3
6
4
6
4
5
5
5
3
3
4
3
1
4
6 bet 1,4,6 x 1.
5 -1. Bet 4,6,5 x 2.
2 -3. Bet 6,5,2 x 3.
4 -6. Bet 5,2,4 x 4.
2 -2. (2^nd) n.b.
2 n.b.
4 n.b.
1 n.b.
1 n.b.
3 n.b.
4 n.b.
3 n.b.
6 n.b.
4 n.b.
1 bet 6,4,1 x 3.
6 +1. (1^st) n.b.
5 bet 1,6,5 x 1 (revert back to x 1 when in profit)
1 +2. (1^st) n.b.
1 n.b.
6 n.b.
6 n.b.
5 n.b.
4 n.b.
1 bet 5,4,1 x 1.
3 +1. Bet 4,1,3 x 2.
5 -1. Bet 1,3,5 x 3.
3 +2. (2^nd) n.b.

Here is how I would play my slight twist if I wanted to play this as a dozens bet.

You will see on a win how I have noted either (1^st) (2^nd) or (3^rd)

The first winning bet was when I played the 5,2,4.

The 2 came up and therefore that is the second outcome from the 5,2,4.

The second winning bet was when I played the 6,4,1.

The 6 came up and therefore that is the first outcome from the 6,4,1.

So now I have a (2^nd) and (1^st) The three has not appeared yet and therefore is the furthest back.

So I can play for a repeat of the (2^nd) and (1^st) which would just see me placing 2 double street bets = a dozen bet.

The advantage of this could be a slightly softer progression on the up as you lose, down as you win d’alambert.


I would have played the 1 and 6 double streets on the third winning bet and the 1 and 3 double streets on the fourth winning bet.

[vile]

Why don't we play lines 245 anytime there is 3 opposite play thos line ,1 up on a loss 1 down on a win,maybe thos will win mor then they lose.what do you think? VILE.

Well you can do as you wish and think is best.
But who know what's the best.Many,many those
line bets and one should find what suits him,how to
play,with continuations or breaks,swapping from one to other,
the more simple the better.Why you ppl. don't try to invent
a progression diff. then those standard ones,that don't put
you so back if losing...maybe here is solve of all problems.
Did you ever thought of that.These math guys could unswer this.

[vile]

Very good FL.....good imagination and direction for others.

[warrior]

Well you can do as you wish and think is best.
But who know what's the best.Many,many those
line bets and one should find what suits him,how to
play,with continuations or breaks,swapping from one to other,
the more simple the better.Why you people. don't try to invent
a progression diff. then those standard ones,that don't put
you so back if losing...maybe here is solve of all problems.
Did you ever thought of that.These math guys could answer this.

What kind of progression would you suggest?

[Tomla021]

I tested another 250 on double zero and went to 4 one time---bravo and thanks! I will test about 500 more and try it out real

[buffalowizard]

Warrior

In his 1st post vile says he uses +1 on a win and -1 on a loss

BW

[vile]

I tested another 250 on double zero and went to 4 one time---bravo and thanks! I will test about 500 more and try it out real

Don't untill you find proper solution.
Its there.

[flukey luke]

A quick game at smartlive (live wheel) using the dozens variation.

4
2
3
3
3
5
6
1 qualify 5,6,1.
5 (1^st) n.b.
3 qualify 1,5,3.
3 (3^rd) n.b. (so looking for (1^st) and (3^rd) to continue.
6 n.b.
5 n.b.
2 bet 6+2 x 1 chip each.
4 -2. Bet 5+4 x 1 chip each.
5 +2. (1^st) n.b.
6 bet 4+6 x 1 chip each.
3 +0. Bet 5+3 x 1 chip each.
3 +4. (3^rd) n.b.
6 n.b.
3 n.b.
5 n.b.
6 n.b.
4 bet 5+4 x 1 chip each.
4 +8. (3^rd) n.b.
6 n.b.
6 n.b.
5 n.b.
6 n.b.
5 n.b.
2 n.b.
6 n.b.
6 n.b.
6 n.b.
3 n.b.
6 n.b.
3 n.b.
5 n.b.
4 bet 3+4 x 1 chip each.
5 +6. (2^nd) so now the (1^st) is furthest back. Play (2^nd)+(3^rd) when betting opportunity arises.
4 n.b.
6 n.b.
4 n.b.
2 n.b.
2 n.b.
2 n.b.
3 n.b.
5 n.b.
2 n.b.
6 bet 2+6 x 1 chip each.
6 +10. (3^rd) n.b.

It never got out of first gear. I was planning on a 1 1, 2 2, 3 3 etc.... progression. (up 1 as you lose, down 1 as you win. Revert to beginning on any new 'highest profit')

[vile]

Man you are getting inane like little school kid.
So will you get of my back you unintelligent.

actually instead of unintelligent it was i...t

[atlantis]

It never got out of first gear. I was planning on a 1 1, 2 2, 3 3 etc.... progression. (up 1 as you lose, down 1 as you win. Revert to beginning on any new 'highest profit')

Hi FlukeyLuke,
That's exact progression that I was thinking of trying - but using vile's way. Thanks for your report.
A.