Method must study it propely

[vile]

2
3
6
4-l...here you continue betting 1,4,5--3 furthest prior to 2,3,6

Overlaping lines....here even me sometimes/last night on 2 tables/get confused
1
5
3
2-l.....usually here 2,4,6.

but I continued 2,3,5......and it went 4,4,4,6,5,which cost me several units.
But anyhow did fine with 5+x3=15x20=300 euros and did this in about 40 spins.
Note,don't force this bet as soon you get the either side strike with resonable
plus its your vages.And its very hard to lose/much/if you play long continous play,which I
don't recomm.

[xxlakis]

It's pretty clear guys.If your first bet after trigger is lost you bet the other 3 lines till you lose again.When this happens you check at that point the 3 last lines and if they are a trigger you continue betting these 3  lines without stopping the betting sequence.Excel is pretty clear.Oh and vile is right,1 year and i am still in + with this.

[atlantis]

OK. Thanks for clearing it up guys!
That is the way I thought it would be.
A.

[Bayes]

1 year and i am still in + with this.

xxlakis,

I'm not picking on you in particular because I see this all the time, but it drives me crazy. What does "1 year" mean in terms of the number of bets in your case?

For it to be meaningful, one would have to know how many times you've visited the casino in the past year and how many bets you made on each of those visits. Someone could play for a year and make 200 bets, someone else might make 20,000 bets. Obviously, the latter would be much more significant in terms of the success of the system than the former.

[/rant]

[vile]

Here is short session of yesterday wiesbaden,
with clear explanations of this bet,for these still
confused.
by the way--Just seen that have started betting without line 3
but the result would be probably same...let see

The score would be W=33,L=22

[vile]

And here is yesterday Wiesbaden 450 spins session,
which you all should study carefully.

As you can see there was only one real strike in complete
session/which by the way.rarely happens,but it does/and after
that strike the game should have been finished,that's how
I always play.Therefore with continous play you would have
been losing 10 un.x3=30.....therefore you must treat this bet
thisway and play so.I did had similar sessions in my real play
but playing 2 tables it always balances well.
As you wish and been told.Good luck.

THIS BET IS RELAYING ON LAST OR FURTHER STRIKES.

[beretta28]

If someone is still winner after 20000 spins,flat bet,(it means 20000 real bets,not waiting for a trigger!),please tell me and I'll ask Norway academy to give him the Nobel Prize for Maths.
Or ,if he prefers,I can organise some seminars(not free of charge,of course!) in the most important Universities in the world.He will be very rich in a few months,much more than playng this silly system.


I think that only a few members(Bayes,Mr.Ore and similar...) should write here.
From now on I won't spend my time to read this section of the forum,full of unbelievable stupid statements.

[vile]

If someone is still winner after 20000 spins,flat bet,(it means 20000 real bets,not waiting for a trigger!),please tell me and I'll ask Norway academy to give him the Nobel Prize for Maths.
Or ,if he prefers,I can organise some seminars(not free of charge,of course!) in the most important Universities in the world.He will be very rich in a few months

Unfortunately this is a trigger bet.Nothing of organising.
We are doing fine thk.no need to get rich.

[atlantis]

And here is yesterday Wiesbaden 450 spins session,
which you all should study carefully.

As you can see there was only one real strike in complete
session/which by the way.rarely happens,but it does/and after
that strike the game should have been finished,that's how
I always play.Therefore with continous play you would have
been losing 10 un.x3=30.....therefore you must treat this bet
thisway and play so.I did had similar sessions in my real play
but playing 2 tables it always balances well.
As you wish and been told.Good luck.

THIS BET IS RELAYING ON LAST OR FURTHER STRIKES.

Thanks for your winning spreadsheet examples vile showing the operation of this system.
By the way  - does this system have a name?

A.

[cofi]

Atlantis --I was looking at that also earlier but things changed when we came to the 1 out of each dozen thing......now on the new whole deal system I think the last 3 work. As in: 8 combinations etc
one way or another this is an interesting thread --I will test for sure

and toMla also, so the system originally posted here is not the same system with the latest at all.

At first we were looking for ANY 4 unique lines, and now for 3 from different dozens.

That's entirely another thing. It seems that new topics here are posted as an opposite strategion from the supposed, like a puzzles, a major twist always occures.

[vile]

If someone is still winner after 20000 spins,flat bet,(it means 20000 real bets,not waiting for a trigger!),please tell me and I'll ask Norway academy to give him the Nobel Prize for Maths.
Or ,if he prefers,I can organise some seminars(not free of charge,of course!) in the most important Universities in the world.He will be very rich in a few months,much more than playng this silly system.


I think that only a few members(Bayes,Mr.Ore and similar...) should write here.
From now on I won't spend my time to read this section of the forum,full of unbelievable silly statements.

Nobody forces you to do so.These guys you mentioned are mathematichs not roulette players
probably you too.Did you ever visit any casino o put a chip on the table?
Many of such here that are selling roulette knowledge and never seen a game live.
Your mate self proclaimed MASTER OF POCKETS is one of those.

[vile]

and toMla also, so the system originally posted here is not the same system with the latest at all.

At first we were looking for ANY 4 unique lines, and now for 3 from different dozens.

That's entirely another thing. It seems that new topics here are posted as an opposite strategion from the supposed, like a puzzles, a major twist always occures.

That was only introduction in STUDY,thats why its call so.

[haloBing]

Thanks for your winning spreadsheet examples vile showing the operation of this system.
By the way  - does this system have a name?

A.

Rolling Lines seems like a good choice to me

[atlantis]

Hi vile,
I noticed in one of your sheets that you waited for all 6 lines to appear first before tracking for the trigger...
I realised that I had not being doing this in my own test(s).
Is it really necessary to do this before starting each session? I mean is it a fixed or optional starting requirement?
A.

[Master_of_pockets]

hahahha atlantis what are u asking ? what are u asking?
Listen to ur self.