Method must study it propely

[Johnlegend]

did i ever post that i believe that there are bet selections???


"""It identifies something random isnt very good at and exploits it"""

LoL...keep dreaming ....

how did u spend the money that u stole from people with your magic bet as c..e..h?
I try to warn them but most of them didn t listen...i saved some thought

I think you need to take your meds. You obviously have me mixed up with someone else. We will see whose dreaming once Bayes gets the RNG done. I will call you out in person when you have no more excuses. And if you have a shread of decency in you. You will appologize not just to me. But many on this forum.

[Tomla021]

I have a copy of Zumma 0/00 with street numbers incorporated.. I finger tested it today for a thousand spins and it seems to have a high hit rate. Keep in mind I didn't write down the results etc. When I get a chance I will record it.
I think it may have something to do with waiting for the 3 dozens to hit as they should, then the usual nature of the game comes into play ......(or something like that-lol)

[GARNabby]

how did u spend the money that u stole from people with your magic bet as c..e..h?
I try to warn them but most of them didn t listen...i saved some thought

Good work, Master.  Had the same experiences which Ellis Davis (, and "head monkey" ADulay,) over at BeattheCasino with their baccarat-scams.

You had a good point about winning by "flat betting" but generally not on the first bet of a session (being a contradiction.)  Thanks.

What tends to happen though, is that most of the "suckers" just drop out of sight after a few months.  I've had several send thanks for helping them save 100's of dollars, but not a single one come back to tell me how wrong I was.

[Tomla021]

well in roulette I think the nature is for sleepers etc to appear and ruin our dreams  , when everything is normal as in 3 dozens appearing 123 I suspect it could be time for a change.  All I know for sure is that when I tested the original version it did well and the complete version looks good at a quick glance....Me thinks its time to test it some more -----
hey the original was tested 200,000 spins and did well on a 1-2 bet----
hope thats ok?

[Tomla021]

did 500 spins ,, end result was 93 wins and 76 losses on 0/00

[Robeenhuut]

Hello

I played it 4 real money yesterday on SML air ball n ended down 30 euros in about 3 hours of play playing 1 euro base bet so basically 10L down. Won first game n afterwards it was mostly steady downtrend  like WLLWWLLL... Never had a real winning streak. This is 2 play with a bigger base bet so after 1 or 2 won games u pocket yr profit n leave.  This was Vile suggestion n i totally agree. In his game results he usually catches a winning trend early in a session. In last results he posted there was 82L and 92W breakdown. I guess something like that happened 2 me but i never had a chance 2 have some winning streak n be ahead. I would not consider it a failure like some suggested but i guess its not 4 everybody.  Actually i like more d original idea with rolling lines n maybe betting 2 games n stopping 2 wait 4 a new trigger. AJ came up with it n he did some tests.
Thanks 4 posting it.

Regards

[beretta28]

Bet selection doesn't exist.
Play random against random is also a dream
The best bet selection I know is the box with the spider(see above)
In this Forum there is a section called "Bet selection".
Whene I want to laugh,I read it


The only roulette players I know that have won something even for long period(but in the very very long period they lose 1,35% or 2,70%) are players using some clever money management,with a bit of luck!

[vile]

MOP,
You really went too far....don't post on my thread,and don't call my name
any longer as I will intervent to ban you/already did once last year/--
Open your own thread and preach to ppl.about roulette without busting
other ppl.threads purposely.Now am deleting your posts and one more
post in my thread you gone.

[Turner]

Vile.....best way I think. Ignore by deleting or you may end up looking like you give a s*it

You should be the moderator of your post.

Turner

[justanothergambler]

MOP, I may understand you point , but it seems to me that you want to tell us to not play roulette or something, but this forum is for ROULETTE, people want to experience things , some play just for fun some for living.. if we dnt play then this forum will not exist and should be closed!
lets just have fun and test peoples ideas and systems, people who play roulette they already know the risks.
cheers

[albertojonas]

Bet selection doesn't exist.
Play random against random is also a dream
The best bet selection I know is the box with the spider(see above)
In this Forum there is a section called "Bet selection".
Whene I want to laugh,I read it


The only roulette players I know that have won something even for long period(but in the very very long period they lose 1,35% or 2,70%) are players using some clever money management,with a bit of luck!

Ad infinitum all bet selections will loose for house edge, that we know. But we play lifesized sessions and try to stay inside the bell curve.
Cheers

[warrior]

Ad infinitum all bet selections will lose for house edge, that we know. But we play lifesized sessions and try to stay inside the bell curve.
Cheers

whats the bell curve?

[justanothergambler]

what's the bell curve?

this might help:
link:://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution

[warrior]

this might help:
link:://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution

yes i remember this now.

[GARNabby]

But we play lifesized sessions and try to stay inside the bell curve.

The less the possible risk, the less the possible profit.