1D1C CONCEPTS

[amk]

                                                                 1D1C  CONCEPTS

Sorry for not posting this in the brainstorm zone but wanted to draw attention to an idea. I have been pondering it for a while but can't see all the angles clearly and how we can forge a good method out of this. Together we will have a lot more creative ideas to work with then by myself.

We are always playing either the dozens or the columns by themselves, CODE 4 alternates but does not play them at the same time. In 1D1C we place 1 unit on dozens and 1 unit on columns. The advantage to 1D1C compared to two dozens or two columns is when a dozen and column bet match up we get +4 units.

One angle I see is to play for a repeat on the dozen and on the column

Each line represents 1 spin:  example 2  3  means ball landed on dozen 2 and column 3

D   C
2   3
3   1
3   2  ..... plus 1 unit on dozen
2   1
1   3
1   3 .....  plus 4 units D/C match up


I hope the creative minds here can see some more possibilities............

[Master_of_pockets]

The point that when the doz and the col will hit at the same time and will give us +4 is better than betting 2 doz or 2 col is irrelative.
Because by betting 2 doz or 2 col u are covering 24 nums but with a doz and a col u are covering 20 nums....
So its exactly the same thing for the matter of profits.

[amk]

Thanks for the input MOP. If you had to present a creative idea here what would it be and I do not mean that fasiciously.

[Master_of_pockets]

There are several bet selection systems on 1doz and 1 col.
All have been tested and none of them could produce a positive balance.
I also like the 1D 1C as a bet and I have also engineered some systems with this bet selection but all failed.
Sorry I don t have any new idea...if I will have I will post it.

I just felt the need to explain to you that it has no deference in betting 1 D 1 C or 2 Doz or 2 COL.
No deference either in betting 2D 1 C or 2C 1 D  or 2D and 2C.

[iggiv]

dozens and columns are too stiff patterns to rely on any of them. Well, some people do win with them, but i don't like this kind of bet selection.

[Master_of_pockets]

who does win with them?

[iggiv]

very few of course

[Master_of_pockets]

I don t think that anyone wins with doz and col....if you mean in some visits OK , but winning steady NO

[Johnlegend]

I win with them everyday, Is that often enough?

[amk]

Any creative thoughts on 1D1C?

[TwoCatSam]

amk

You seem like a reasonable Joe.  Would you like me to express myself, or just stay off your thread?

Know from the start, I'll point out the fallacies of any argument.

TwoCat

[justanothergambler]

D   C
2   3
3   1
3   2 
2   1
1   3
1   3

i see that the dz and cl exchange the winning number diagonaly if you notice, instead of waiting the repeat swap their numbers.
when you play doz , play the last cls number that just hit and vice versa

[justanothergambler]

amk

You seem like a reasonable Joe.  Would you like me to express myself, or just stay off your thread?

Know from the start, I'll point out the fallacies of any argument.

TwoCat

Sam just express yourself man! we are here to listen

[amk]

Thanks JAG!

Had not seen that angle.

TwoCat, I am just trying to get creative ideas generated here, not saying that this is a winning method and MOP already pointed somethings out to me. I have not seen this approach discussed much on any forum and wanted to see what people think but more importantly see if they can come up with a creative idea. We can only advance through creativity, even though we have more than enough winning methods on this forum

[TwoCatSam]

I am only going to make one statement as I don't want to appear "always the negative guy" on the forum.

Creativity is a wonderful thing.  If it is truly creativity.  Trying to find a way to make the Martingale work is not creativity, it is wasted energy, emotion and possibly money.

When I see someone doing something which I know from past experience is a futile effort, I want to tell them to stop and look in a different direction.

Meatloaf:  There ain't no coupe deville hiding at the bottom of a cracker jack box.

You can dig the rest of your life, but it ain't there!!

While running the Super-Roulette robot--yep, here I go again--I learned that creating seemingly difficult things for the wheel to do is futile.  The wheel will do as it darn well pleases.  Creating matrices and fooling yourself into believing you have outfoxed random outcomes is just another couple deville.

Many of the things written on this forum are merely a slower way to lose, which is not all bad. 

Lastly, to those who say "I've done it!" you need to finish the sentence.  "I've done it--so far!"

TwoCatSam