Last 3

[warrior]

"""But this is just an idea to explore whether or not it works."""

Yes I know that this is just an idea.
The problem is that this concept/idea doesn't have a logic.

Anyway I am leaving you do your stuff.

pocket  there is nothing about roulette that is supposed to be logic.

[Carsch]

An even better and more solid idea: instead of waiting for a loss before placing bets, wait for 3 consecutive losses and go 1,2,4.................lose the 3 bets and go +2 on a loss, -2 on a win till recovery.

This is a slow system and should be played with one or more slow systems.

[Master_of_pockets]

warrior when say logic...i mean it has no logic t be a winner.

[Turner]

MOP....see my post ...but basically....there is no logic in trying to imagine that totally independant numbers somehow relate to each other.

Hottest system i have seen recently performed live in a casino is this

get really drunk with a friend. Throw lots of chips everywhere as you fall off your stool. Let the croupier guess where you wanted to put them from your grunts from the floor....then collect your £45. Wheres the logic in that hot winning system?

Turner

[Master_of_pockets]

this system is an old loser and it is called Drunk System. LoL

[amk]

link:://:.google.nl/imgres?q=swedish+chef+pictures&hl=nl&sa=X&tbm=isch&prmd=imvns&tbnid=ClsRPtXjkrldPM:&imgrefurl=link:://:.swedishchefinva.com/&docid=ovDYpECFQBh7yM&imgurl=link:://:.swedishchefinva.com/resources/6a010537202515970b0120a69cd871970b-800wi.jpg&w=407&h=568&ei=-rLfT9SOI4e18QPq7NWZCg&zoom=1&iact=rc&dur=385&sig=110093819958348164641&page=1&tbnh=142&tbnw=102&start=0&ndsp=19&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0,i:74&tx=61&ty=87&biw=1280&bih=671

[Johnlegend]

MOP to you nothing has any logic to be a winner, So now you are supposed to give us an example of something that does, I wonder how long we would wait for that,?