Last 3

[Carsch]

Record the last 3 outcomes. We will try to match these outcomes as follows:

First outcome: we look for either RED or BLACK
Second outcome: we look for either ODD or EVEN
Third outcome: we want HIGH or LOW

Ex:
5......red
13.....odd
24......high

Our next 3 bets will be:

RED for the first spin
ODD for the second spin
HIGH for the third spin

The first bet is a paper bet (not a real bet)
Trigger: must lose the first paper bet to bet real money
Progression: +1 as you lose, -1 as you win till recovery

Example:

12......Red
6.........Even
5.........Odd

On paper, we will bet Red on our first spin

13.......lose (this is our trigger). Next we bet 1u. on EVEN
16.......it's even, and we win (+1). We start over with a new session

Last 3 spins we have: (5) RED, (13) ODD, (16) LOW. On paper we bet RED on the next spin

34..........win. No bets. Start a new session and wait for trigger

Last three (13, 16, 34). That's BLACK, EVEN & HIGH

21..........lose (trigger).......next bet is on EVEN
23..........lose (0).....................next bet is on HIGH
8............lose (-2)....................we start a new session witthout waiting for a trigger

We have RED, ODD & LOW

33.........lose (-5)
14.........lose (-9)
2...........win. (-4)...........we end this session but continue with the progression

Last 3: BLACK, EVEN, LOW

17............paper win..........start new session

Last 3: RED, EVEN, LOW

22........lose (that's the trigger)
18........win (0). Start new session

Last 3: BLACK, EVEN, LOW

18..........Paper loss (that's the trigger)
22..........win (+2) Note, i bet 2u. instead of 3u. because it's enough to recover my losses and bring me a minimal profit.

Inspired by the 3-line bet system posted here by Vile

[amk]

Hello Carsch,

I remember sending you a pm at least 8 months ago, I think it was concerning this system. I will try and find what question I sent. I remember it was for a very promising method, looked solid.

[GLC]

Carsch, 
Very interesting system.
I like it very much. 
Good to see you posting. 
You've always been someone I admire because of some of your unique bet progressions.

There's so many excellent systems in process right now that I'm like a kid in a candy store.  Problem is I'm so busy with life, I can't devote all the time to roulette study that I want to.

It's like the kid just finished Thanksgiving dinner and can't eat another bite, even candy.

Rats,

GLC

P.S.  I will find time to test this some.

[amk]

Me to GLC

[GLC]

I don't see why we can't play 3 games at once.
Each starting with a differet even chance. 1) Red/black  2) Odd/even  3) High/low.
Not so much non-betting spins that way.
Any thoughts on that.

[Tomla021]

always like your progressions ,, let me take a look see at this....like george says a lot of interesting stuff on here now

[amk]

.

[Carsch]

Same here GLC, been busy with other things. I haven't explored this system and its other possibilities much yet,  though that seems an interesting idea for playing 3 games at once.

amK, i'm sure it can be played different ways.

Also, one can wait for 2 consecutive losses (instead of one) and use 1,2,4.............and if we lose the 3 bets, go up 2u on a loss, down 2u on a win till recovery. Seems to work as well.

[Carsch]

First 100 numbers from the 500 spins posted by Wally Gator on the thread "method must study it properly"

Profit: +17 units
Highest bet: 6 units

#       
30  BET        PROFIT     
30       
15       
29 R L TRIGGER  W/L
25 E                L -1
32 L                L -3
31 B               W 0

30 R W     
35 R L   TRIGGER   
16 O                L -1
15 H                L -3
29 B                W 0

4 R L TRIGGER   
36 O                 L -1
26 H                W 1

36 B L TRIGGER   
26 E                W 2

4 B W     
4 R L TRIGGER   
4 E                  W 3

16 B L TRIGGER   
9 E                   L 2
20 L                 L 0
20 R                 L -3
31 O                W 1

19 B L TRIGGER   
14 E                 W 4

22 B W     
31 R L TRIGGER   
19 E                 L 3
6 H                   L 1
20 B                W 4

0       
20 R L TRIGGER   
0 E                   L 2
18 E                W 5

36 B L TRIGGER   
20 E                W 6

16 R W     
28 R L TRIGGER   
34 E                W 7

31 R L TRIGGER   
8 E                  W 8

0       
13 R L TRIGGER   
20 O                L 7
26 L                L 5
23 B                L 2
4 E                 W 6

32 B L TRIGGER   
22 O               L 3
36 L               L -1
2 R                 L -6
8 E                W 0

34 R W     
36 B L TRIGGER   
16 E               W 5

5 R W     
28 R L TRIGGER   
2 E                W 9

15 R L TRIGGER   
35 E                L 8
29 L                L 6
4 B                 W 9

5 B L TRIGGER   
30 O                L 7
17 L               W 10

0       
15 R L TRIGGER   
18 E               W 11

36 B L TRIGGER   
20 O                 L 10
13 L                W 12

30 R W     
5 B L TRIGGER   
22 O                L 11
17 H                L 9
20 R                L 6
6 E                  W 10

7 B L TRIGGER   
14 E                W 13

16 B L TRIGGER   
31 O              W 14

0       
2 R L TRIGGER   
31 E               L 13
14 H               L 11
4 B               W 14

30 B L TRIGGER   
4 E                W 16

12 B L TRIGGER   
11 E              L 15
26 L              L 13
6 R                L 10
21 O             W 14

15 B W     
13 B W     
21 R W     
23 B L TRIGGER   
9 O               W +17

[Master_of_pockets]

I will not ruin the Topic.
I just want to ask : What is the relationship of the 3 INEPENDENT spins? What is the reason of this system to win?

[catalyst]

carsch
wellcome back.  i am grateful to you for learning the game.the inspiration you provided 18 months ago.
thanks
catalyst

[Drazen]

George my friend you said it is interesting to you? If i may ask why?


Arent we all too tired from JL-s matrices? Well this is perfectly the same dont you see, only better progression which i have to regard.


Dear carsch, you can play match or non match on any spin you want (3rd, 4th, milionth or zilionth) it is all the same. Actualy little more chances you will have if you will play on 6th and 7th spins because on these 2 spins you will have most repeats. ( Run simulation if you dont belive)
But anyhow it wont give you enough advantage to avoid big draftdowns or overcome the edge.


If you dont measure deviation (ecart) it is all the same what you do. LUCK.


Better would be playing whole pattern or reduce bets with same probability, like ego showed in some of his threads.




Regards




Drazen

[albertojonas]

George my friend you said it is interesting to you? If i may ask why?


aren't we all too tired from JL-s matrices? Well this is perfectly the same don't you see, only better progression which i have to regard.


Dear carsch, you can play match or non match on any spin you want (3rd, 4th, milionth or zilionth) it is all the same. Actualy little more chances you will have if you will play on 6th and 7th spins because on these 2 spins you will have most repeats. ( Run simulation if you don't belive)
But anyhow it won't give you enough advantage to avoid big draftdowns or overcome the edge.


If you don't measure deviation (ecart) it is all the same what you do. LUCK.


Better would be playing whole pattern or reduce bets with same probability, like ego showed in some of his threads.




Regards




Drazen

Also if you use +1 on a loss, same on a win, your recovery will be nicer =)
This follows the principal that you have to bet more when you win and less on your losses.


Just my two cents...

[Carsch]

Master of pockets, the idea with this system is that when we have a pattern such as the one made up with this system , two things may happen: that same pattern won't repeat in the next 3 spins, or it will.

In the first case (if it doesn't repeat), chances are that one or two numbers will be off, or all of them will be off (completely opposite of our preset pattern). Thus, if that pattern is broken on the first spin (first spin is opposite the first outcome of last 3), we can also assume that the next 2 spins won't be completely opposite of those 2 from our established pattern - meaning that at least one of them will hit/match.

But this is just an idea to explore whether or not it works.

[Master_of_pockets]

"""But this is just an idea to explore whether or not it works."""

Yes I know that this is just an idea.
The problem is that this concept/idea doesn t have a logic.

Anyway I am leaving you do ur stuff.