• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The JL Challenge

Started by Bayes, Jun 20, 06:04 PM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Drazen

I know that very well John. Yes i my first lost money was on RNG, but some can say it was a system of course it will loose :)


But anyway, yes that on WH was ultimate prove to me, and no one can convince me opposite  >:D 


I wish you all the best in your challenge, just dont use martingale and miracles maybe could happen =)


Cheers


Drazen


vile

--You have my support Johny boy

Johnlegend

Quote from: drazen_cro on Jul 03, 02:55 PM 2012
I know that very well John. Yes i my first lost money was on RNG, but some can say it was a system of course it will lose :)


But anyway, yes that on WH was ultimate prove to me, and no one can convince me opposite  >:D 


I wish you all the best in your challenge, just don't use martingale and miracles maybe could happen =)


Cheers


Drazen
Drazen I am against suicidal Martingales. But there is nothing wrong with mild progressions. I only risk in relation to my BR. Thats why you wont see me touch a 26 unit or more progression until I have at least 400 units. And thats what everyone should be doing. You always bet in relation to the size of you BR. Never ever risking more than 10% of it on any one game. Never ever.

Johnlegend

Quote from: vile on Jul 03, 03:03 PM 2012
--You have my support Johny boy
Thanks Vile. If I make 400 units. I will be using your line Method from time to time.

TwoCatSam

Gonna use any Voodoo?
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Johnlegend

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Jul 03, 03:25 PM 2012
Gonna use any Voodoo?
What on earth is that Sam. You on the Rum and Coke tonight?? ^-^

Bayes

Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 03, 03:06 PM 2012
Drazen I am against suicidal Martingales. But there is nothing wrong with mild progressions.

The second session played had 10 losses in a row. Nuff said.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Robeenhuut

Quote from: Bayes on Jul 04, 04:26 AM 2012
The second session played had 10 losses in a row. Nuff said.

What method was played n what represented a loss?
Matt

Bayes

"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Bayes

RH, no idea what systems JL is using, PATTERN BREAKER maybe? He seems to be staking very conservatively at the moment, which is a bit surprising because most of his systems involve doubling-up.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Robeenhuut

Quote from: Bayes on Jul 04, 04:47 AM 2012
RH, no idea what systems JL is using, PATTERN BREAKER maybe? He seems to be staking very conservatively at the moment, which is a bit surprising because most of his systems involve doubling-up.

So u can not see his actual bets but only results?
Matt

Bayes

I can "see" the bets in the sense that each placed bet is recorded by the software and is uploaded to the web site. I didn't bother to record the no-bets (or virtual bets), I didn't think there was any point, and it's only the actual placed bets which count, of course. You can't quit the program and start again, so it's not possible to "cherry pick" the best results.

I suppose if I'd included all the spins that were generated then it would be possible to work out what system JL is using, but why bother? it's not as if his systems are a secret.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

Johnlegend

Quote from: Bayes on Jul 04, 05:16 AM 2012
I can "see" the bets in the sense that each placed bet is recorded by the software and is uploaded to the web site. I didn't bother to record the no-bets (or virtual bets), I didn't think there was any point, and it's only the actual placed bets which count, of course. You can't quit the program and start again, so it's not possible to "cherry pick" the best results.

I suppose if I'd included all the spins that were generated then it would be possible to work out what system JL is using, but why bother? it's not as if his systems are a secret.
Bayes Im playing PB Pattern 8 and ec matrix at the moment.

Johnlegend

What seemed like 10 losses was 3 methods making me wait for a win. I'm playing no more than 2 now and being tight with staking until I reach 300 units. 


Robeenhuut

Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 04, 08:10 AM 2012
What seemed like 10 losses was 3 methods making me wait for a win. I'm playing no more than 2 now and being tight with staking until I reach 300 units.

Why  r u tight with  staking John?  How long is it going 2 take u 2 increase yr BR to 50%?
What is going 2 change if u reach 300u?  R u going 2 increase yr bet size or play different method?
Matt

-