The JL Challenge

[Johnlegend]

Gentlemen

Let's not etch his tombstone just yet. 

Sam

wise words Sam, I'm. 29 units down not 129. Ive been from 141 to 214 so far always been ahead at some point in a session but broke my own rules. Been trying to rush myself, now I'm going play as I should pure hit and run.

[Drazen]

link:://:.doktorsnake.com/voodoo-spells/voodoo-gambling-spells/

I just saw this. C mon don't tell me this is for real?! 

Not some sort of joke or play?

Pure voodo sh*t and we can pay to practice it to beat roulette?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha i fall off my chair!!!

Wheels,  croupiers and pitt bosses be aware that if i don't win you will be affected by magic of voooooooddddooooooo 

Good to have this, i know many people who should schedule seance then! 

Cheers

[Johnlegend]

Skakus,

I can easily set up another web page if you want to have a crack at it, just let me know and I'll send you a link to download the software.

@ John,

Never mind mate, it happens. I'm sure you'll claw your way back.

Yes Bayes count on it. I've been as low as 90 units on ladbrokes Rng and made a recovery and ended up over 500 units. Can't. Play today have to drive. Familly long distance.  But Friday, Saturday. And Sunday will play at least 10 sessions

[superman]

now I'm going play as I should pure hit and run

Aww c'mon fella, you did say your method would play continually without problems against RNG day and night, are the rules changing mate?

[Johnlegend]

JL you told me before in another topic that i should wait until Bayes had the RNG finished.
You speak about showing me incredible results that would change my opinions.

Now i am here - can you show me the incredible results.

Early days Ego, come.back round September /October.

[Robeenhuut]

Aww c'mon fella, you did say your method would play continually without problems against RNG day and night, are the rules changing mate?

Hola Superman

They r his rules. Let him play with d stuff he is comfortable with. Bayes supplies d spins n JL plays.

Regards

[Johnlegend]

Aww c'mon fella, you did say your method would play continually without problems against RNG day and night, are the rules changing mate?

That's Double match Superman need 400 units minumum to play it. Maybe shouldve asked.  Bayes to. Start me at 400. Patience. Superman its. Very early days.

[justanothergambler]

Oh Goody 

Give me a little while to set up the page and make a couple of minor changes to the program. You do know this is outside bets only? just thought I'd mention it because I know you like to bet the inside. I'm planning to write another version which includes the full layout, but that will be a while coming.

thats great bayes! I can test mine on your RNG too when finished.
thanx mate.

-JL: good luck mate, no pressure and take your time!

[TwoCatSam]

Guys,  I don't really believe in voodoo. 

[ego]

-

JL=voodoo

When he waste time with RNG so do i teach others how to play the game for real ...
JL does not know so much about roulette.

[justanothergambler]

Guys,  I don't really believe in voodoo.

we know Sam! but thats your trademark word in the forum. I like it actually. thats the right word to describe those systems

[Still]

-

JL=voodoo

When he waste time with RNG so do i teach others how to play the game for real ...
JL does not know so much about roulette.

Hi ego,

Would you be willing to play your best method(s) on Bayes RNG so we could compare progress? 

Re:  Do you like even money bets - then your search ends here.   
link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=9585.15

Myself and several others were a little unclear.  I offered to help clarify/translate by starting a Questions & Answers dialogue until i understood your method. I wanted to learn it.  carpanta offered a point of view, and wrote well, but it was left uncertain whether that was also what you were trying to say.  We never heard back from you.  Instead of my search ending there, i began to look at all your threads and found that your methods are explained more or less here there and everywhere in several threads over two or three forums.  I was hoping you would follow through with the "search ends here" thread to tie all your best methods, and latest research into one thread that would end all threads on the subject.  I would make the effort to learn it thoroughly if you would make the effort to teach it.  It would be especially motivating if those methods also showed a rising equity curve on Bayes RNG. 


Thanks for your consideration.   

~Still

[Drazen]

          @ still

My friend, i should say that you shouldnt diverge so much from theme of thread like you did with this.
Open new thread for that discussion or speak directly to thread maker in that thread or through PM-s. Those are forum rules.

Further, if you read it right, which i see you didn't, you should read that is not a method, and that you would have to do your own testing and observations to get method.

What mr. ego does there is just showing how to place less bets to get same probability. In other words how to apply same dozen probability on EC-s.

You can apply it on any dozen strategy. I ll give you best shot by my opinion. And you should do testing and see will it work or can you make something better.

First you need to understand that concept what mr.ego explains. It is written very clear and you have examples also, so if you can't understand it from there i am afraid i don't know who could explain it more clear.

So this could be the method:

On dozzens you would play like this. Whenever you have two different dozens in a row you bet them to repeat. So you are playing that all 3 won't whow up in a row, and that i like to call perfect state.

Why play like this?

Because number of combinations is in our favour.


Okay we would have 6 perfect states:

123
132
213
231
312
321

And twelve other states

122
121
232
233
311
313
211
212
322
323
131
133

So you are winning on 12 patterns and losing on 6 + green round number.

Apply this on EC-s through states of series and singels as ego is explaining because you will need to place less bets then on dozens to get excat same probability, spice it with good MM of course, test it thouroghly and see what am i about here.

But this is system, and we know with systems nothing is due to happen 

Sory mr. Bayes for interuption of your thread with this, move it if you want.

Cheers

Drazen

[ego]

Would you be willing to play your best method(s) on Bayes RNG so we could compare progress? 

Why would i - waste of time and Bayes knows that.
All systems fail - i apologies saying that - but that is the truth.

[vile]

Why would i - waste of time and Bayes knows that.
All systems fail - i apologies saying that - but that is the truth.

--TRUE ON ZILLION SPINS...UNTRUE ON SEPARATE PLAYING SESSIONS.