The JL Challenge

[Skakus]

Thanks Skakus for being such a good sport, and an excellent result. 

Thanks Bayes.

I'll keep playing with the encrypted version for some time to come. I want 4 standard deviations at least!

[Turner]

that's a paradox here. JL is still JL, but Still is still not JL.
Or should i say JL is still not Still but Still is still Still

I am really confused.

It cant be a paradox because it isnt wholly provable if what i said was true or false.due to the lack of proof it isnt self reference, infinite regress or a circular definition ;-)

[superman]

Thanks Skakus for being such a good sport, and an excellent result.

Yes well done Danny, very good run, good luck at hitting the 4 SD

[Johnlegend]

Hehe John

I did not think you would continue this way  But if you are so confident of your strike rate then maybe adjust your progression so you would win in first 3 steps and break even on 4th step and lose a bit on the last one. Straight Marty for DZ is a bit scary 
But its your challenge so good luck.

Regards

Hello Hutt yes, I have a few staking ideas in mind. Im trying to find out how good it is first. I havent lost yet. Overall I'm 490/0. If I get up to say 1500 points. I may start waiting for TWO triggers then enter play using 5--15--45. So it makes the wait worthwhile. And I will track both. COLUMNS and DOZENS for faster turnover. Let's see how it goes over the first 1200 games.

[TwoCatSam]

**** in the region of 400/1 longterm.****

John

Some clarification is in order here.  Are you saying you're betting an even chance, be it red/black---whatever---and you have a strike rate somewhere in the neighborhood of 400 to 1?

You're saying--for example--that when certain circumstances present themselves--you will win your EC bet at a rate near 400 to 1?

A simple, straight answer would be most appreciated.

Sam

[Johnlegend]

**** in the region of 400/1 longterm.****

John

Some clarification is in order here.  Are you saying you're betting an even chance, be it red/black---whatever---and you have a strike rate somewhere in the neighborhood of 400 to 1?

You're saying--for example--that when certain circumstances present themselves--you will win your EC bet at a rate near 400 to 1?

A simple, straight answer would be most appreciated.

Sam

Hello Sam, I'm playing. Columns and dozens. What I'm saying is my 80 unit four step progression could survive 400 times to every loss. At present I'm 490/0. Obviously the win loss gaps can vary. I might win 600 times then lose twice in the next 200 games. Hope that anwsers your queerie.

[TwoCatSam]

****** your queerie.********

I'll have you know, I'm straight as an arrow!!

But thanks for the answer.  That clears it up.

Sam

[subby]

Sorry JL/everyone.

I think far and away most interest is in JL's challenge so I don’t mind stepping down from the challenge and handing the original software over to JL if he agrees to revert back to uploading the results.
I’m rapidly closing in on a 3+ z-score so I consider myself victorious anyway. Besides, I can continue with the new software, you just won’t be able to trust my future results, pity.

can someone please tell me what a z-score is?

[SamNL]

can someone please tell me what a z-score is?

link:://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_score

[subby]

thanks but what sort of real life info does it show? That link was really technical for me to understand lol 

[Skakus]

subby,

This link explains it better for roulette.

link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=13193.0


Cheers.

[Tomla021]

thanks man,,,,any explanation on your funky d'alembert?

[Johnlegend]

Progress update. I have now trebled the starting BR of 300 units. And my balance stands at 921 points. For those interested. I am swapping between three methods at the moment. As I have now reached what I call the comfort zone. It should be academic from here on to reach 5000 points. The only question is how long it will take.
I am using the ZONE. FIVE and DIVIDE and CONQUER. At the moment. From time to time I will bring in other methods like TRILOGY and PATTERN BREAKER. To add a bit of variety. You can see my results at the link STILL has provided on page 36. Many thanks.

[Still]

Update.
Gives new meaning to the term "up"-date.

[attachimg=1]

[TwoCatSam]

Quite impressive.

Does anyone see the big "IF" in the last couple of posts?

Sam