The JL Challenge

[amk]

Can't find The Zone at the moment. I must admit that it has been a longtime since I saw it last or its origins.


Its out there

[TwoCatSam]

Thanks for looking!

[Nickmsi]

Sam . . . try this, it may be the Zone you are looking for.  don't forget to bookmark it (he he)
Nick


link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=16103.0

[TwoCatSam]

Nick

That was it.  I'm all over that thread!

Sam

[vundarosa]

Me too Sam, this whole test/challenge was started as JL said he had the ONE system that would kill RNG day and night, so in a real world he has failed the challenge. The fact that the challenge has now morphed into the use of multiple systems is irrelevent to the initial reasoning behind the challenge, it's now simply to see if he, the person, can beat the RNG using whatever system for whatever duration he wants, as hit n run is now also in the mix.

------------------------
here \0/  here \0/  here \0/     fully in agreement

vundarosa

[donik7777]

Hello John!
Many thanks for job and effort!
We waiting your method and that very fast for testing than testing you alone.
Best regards.

[vundarosa]

Not only that but he will show us the way if he is indeed successful. In my book that is a nice person.

----------------

forget it amk....the way is the human factor..... how can we be shown that?

vundarosa

[Robeenhuut]

----------------

forget it amk....the way is the human factor..... how can we be shown that?

vundarosa

If the method is posted you will get all the rules. Challenge is just to show how it works - you have to change your staking plan sometimes to adjust to your winning goal or stop loss but the core of the method stays the same.

[Robeenhuut]

Superman I've got the one system that can beat anything day and night. I got it through sheer determination not to be defeated. I had another method that can beat Ladbrokes, but it wasn't as good on here. Now I have Thee method. The Zone which you think the world of, has layed the golden goose. Be happy, losing days are over for any who stick with FIVE. Hutt thinks fluke. Ill go how ever far any of you want.

Until even the most ardent pessimist will know, this games over if enough ever played Five.

Even if i thought it was a fluke i would still play it. John you dont need to say that you guarantee that it would work over and over again. If the results are stellar in large number of spins then everybody should start playing this.

[Johnlegend]

----------------

forget it amk....the way is the human factor..... how can we be shown that?

vundarosa

Of course you can be shown that. The thing Is Vundarosa are you ready to learn anything? Some people are too set in their ways. Also you don't read my posts properly. What did I say about FIVE?

And patience and discipline are still very important. When you are playing live. As Chauncy said the way I play is not for everyone. Even if I won a Million points on this challenge. Not even 20% of members on this forum would take notice. The human mind is not for changing with most people.

For many to accept I've succeeded. They must also question their own intelligence, for having believed what so-called experts said for so long. That is a bitter pill to swallow for many. Better for them to turn away and pretend nothings happening. Or come up with some excuse, that exact rules weren't followed.

Winning is winning. I had to learn on the job to beat this Rng. When I was down at 115 everybody had me written off. Except me. I've been there before. Now I'm up there. There's still plenty who don't like it. Some people can never be pleased.

[vundarosa]

If the method is posted you will get all the rules. Challenge is just to show how it works - you have to change your staking plan sometimes to adjust to your winning goal or stop-loss but the core of the method stays the same.

-----------------

Robeenhuut, what is being said is not about adjusting the staking plan....what i get from JL now is that there's a human factor in selecting what system to play....given that, how can you guarantee the same results from person to person it beats me......this is what has been said before, that JL might inadvertently be doing something that leads him to have the results that are so different than if you'd just step to the table and robotically play the system...i say that the system selection criteria should also be discussed if we are to have nearly the same results as JL posts.

vundarosa

[vundarosa]

Of course you cam be shown that. The thing. Is Vundarosa are you ready to learn anythilng? Some people are too set in their ways. Also you don't read my posts properly. What did I say about FIVE?

And patience and discipline are still very important. When you are playing live.

---------------------

i don't are so much about FIVE at this point.....your claims about it are just the same as about every system you promote when you first release them....when time goes out you mellow out on your claims....so i'd rather wait till you're more sober on your assessment of FIVE to even consider it

vundarosa

[Johnlegend]

---------------------

i don't are so much about FIVE at this point.....your claims about it are just the same as about every system you promote when you first release them....when time goes out you mellow out on your claims....so i'd rather wait till you're more sober on your assessment of FIVE to even consider it

vundarosa

That isn't what I'm referring to. You and Sam have jumped on this HUMAN FACTOR issue. What I'm sayiing to you is FIVE can be played as you put it robotically. Its going to win. The only thing you need is the patience. That's your price for success. Its by far the best method I've ever seen. And I've enthused over any method that I could win with.

This is the best of them all. I had to revisit the ZONE to find it. Now its up to each individual once its out there.

[Johnlegend]

-----------------

Robeenhuut, what is being said is not about adjusting the staking plan....what i get from JL now is that there's a human factor in selecting what system to play....given that, how can you guarantee the same results from person to person it beats me......this is what has been said before, that JL might inadvertently be doing something that leads him to have the results that are so different than if you'd just step to the table and robotically play the system...i say that the system selection criteria should also be discussed if we are to have nearly the same results as JL posts.

vundarosa

Vundarosa I can go all the way to 5000 points with one method, and one staking plan robotically. In fact that's what ill do. You are making too much of the Human factor issue. If you want winning on auto pilot. I can do that too. When you have the one. You have it all.

[vundarosa]

Vundarosa I can go all the way to 5000 points with one method, and one staking plan robotically. In fact that's what ill do. You are making too much of the Human factor issue. If you want winning on auto pilot. I can do that too. When you have the one. You have it all.

------------------

then post the method, the rules and stick to it.....lets see

vundarosa