system9 'my personal h.g.'

[GLC]

A general statement. 
This Penthouse method is an excellent method to use on any payoff bet.
Even chances would use the following:
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9etc... Move 1 to the right on a loss and 1 to the left on a win.
Dozens:
1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 etc...Move 1 to the right on a loss and 2 to the left on a win.
Lines:
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4etc...Move 1 to the right on a loss and 5 to the left on a win.

You can adjust all the lines to make them more or less aggressive.  Just add more numbers at each level for safety and remove numbers at each level for agressiveness.

Or, you can adjust how many units you move to the left on a win.  Take dozens for example, you could only move 1 step to the left on a win instead of 2.  Don't make the mistake of moving more than the appropriate number of steps to the left on a win or you will find yourself still in the hole when you get back to the beginning of the line.
I say it's a mistake, not always.  It can also be a buffer to keep from your bets getting too high.  But that's for another time.

[Bassie the Clown]

My biggest respect and thanks to Luke and Ophis for this nice piece of work. I'll keep you posted on my progress. Live wheels only 

[GLC]

I just received a PM from Malcop and in it he triggered a concept that I wanted to share with the forum.  It has to do with all the tweaks that are suggested as soon as someone posts a new system.  I admit that I am one of the offenders.  I apologize for the many times I have been guilty of doing this exact thing.  I comes from being a system designer and always seeing a different way to approach a new system.  Not better, just different.

Malcop's comment made me think of this large dam that you walk up to and notice that there's a hole leaking water and there are many other holes that have plugs in them.  You grab a plug, pull it out of the hole it's plugging and run over and push it into the hole that's unplugged.  What's the problem with this picture?  The hole you took the plug out of is now leaking just as bad as the one you plugged up.

Our problem is there's at least 1 too few plugs to plug all the leaks.  It's called the house edge.  There's 100 holes and only 97 plugs.  Leave other people's systems alone for at least a week to see if it needs fixing.  It probably will, but your fix will need fixing also.  End of story.

Now have a good day,

George

[GLC]

I just wanted to make a point regarding the Penthouse progression.  When you play a double dozens system and you use the penthouse progression on all three dozens separately, there is a safety brake that can be applied if one of the dozens has a long losing run.  You can take the extra units from 1 dozen and add them to the other 2 dozens.  This keeps the unit sizes more proportional.  In the same way, if 1 dozen is having a really good run and the other 2 dozens are getting larger and larger bet sizes, you can take some of their units and put them on the hot dozen.  These 2 practices can keep the bets more moderate and if anything they will result in winning a few more units.  Test it out and see if I'm not right.

I used the dozens, but it applies to all bet locations as well. Even Chances, Lines, Streets, Splits, even Single numbers.  Heck, it's the pinnacle of bet progression methods.  Now that we all know about it, all casinos might as well close their doors.

Just kidding,

GLC

[jarabo002]

GLC, in this forum your work is amazing. I have learned many things from you.

[vundarosa]

The penthouse is indeed a powerfull progression...thx for posting it up GLC.
I had a go with the 3 doz and won 10u very easily.

vundarosa

[jarabo002]

Again, I am going to ask for a dgt code, an excel file o something similar to play the Penthouse 3 dozens progression as GLC explain it, with a reset on a new profit, and distribute the bets in case of big holes. Because it can be difficult to track.

[speed]

GLC, in this forum your work is amazing. I have learned many things from you.

First u need to learn that if system is losing in flat bet then progression will not help.

[Master_of_pockets]

"""First u need to learn that if system is losing in flat bet then progression will not help."""

Unfortunately this is truth.

Except if the losses in a row are limited. But this also can t happen.

[Robeenhuut]

"""First u need to learn that if system is losing in flat bet then progression will not help."""

Unfortunately this is truth.

Except if the losses in a row are limited. But this also can t happen.

Yeah... cliche after cliche  there r 2 many factors involved 2 make such a claim. What is flat bet?  How many spins, win goal, stop-loss etc...Test a system over a number of spins flat n with prog n then you could really tell.

[jarabo002]

Yeah... cliche after cliche  there r 2 many factors involved 2 make such a claim. What is flat bet?  How many spins, win goal, stop-loss etc...Test a system over a number of spins flat n with prog n then you could really tell.

Of course!

[albertojonas]

"""First u need to learn that if system is losing in flat bet then progression will not help."""

Unfortunately this is truth.

Except if the losses in a row are limited. But this also can t happen.

Try to ride the peaks of your bet selection.
Simplistically you can attack after a Win that comes after a series of Losses. ...LLW
-That you can try to reduce fluctuation. (losses in a row)
-There are other options as skipping bets, and filtering the registry. For more on that:
link:://rouletteforum.cc/testing-zone/13/ec-no-trolling/9594/
[/size]
Cheers

[GLC]

First u need to learn that if system is losing in flat bet then progression will not help.

Boring!

[speed]

Boring!

Perhaps,  but it is truth, deviations kill all progressions.

[donik7777]

If the next step does not have a deviation of the difference will always be I've tried dozens of systems. All of them are not working because of the deviations.