1 dozen system elite

[albertojonas]

in my opinion:
222, 123, 132, 213, 231, 321, 312 do not clarify a specific trend and are the only patterns that do not qualify.
Cheers

[sniper]

this is the Goldstein progression which some of you guys might like to try on the doz.  & col.


1 +1 +1 +2 +2 +3 +3 +3 +3 +4 +5 +5+5 +5 +5 +6 +6 +6 +6 +6 = 78



up on a loss; 3 down on a win. costs you 78 units after 20 losses in a row.



cheers



hans

Hello Buffalowizard,


Is this progression  applicable to your system?


Regards

[buffalowizard]

in my opinion:
222, 123, 132, 213, 231, 321, 312 do not clarify a specific trend and are the only patterns that do not qualify.
Cheers

Alberto it may well be plausible for the system
Another member suggested similar.

Perhaps taking them out makes it more solid overall

[albertojonas]

my 4 tests so far, different progressions though. 


[attachimg=1]


[attachimg=2]


[attachimg=3]


[attachimg=4]

[monaco]

here's a quick 570 spin example.. I've also taken out the 123 variations for this test, & using the progression from Sniper.

any win on the 1st 6 steps (1-1-1-2-2-3) and i would simply re-set to the first step.

570 spins
63 bets placed
+31 units
biggest bet 3u

will run through some more SmartLive actuals & the losing tests of albertojonas..
thanks for posting BuffaloWizzard.

[soggett]

Do you want post 43 or 44 removed?

BW

in 44 can see all so 43 thanks

what u think about what i said? betting against the H/L forming?

[buffalowizard]

Hello Buffalowizard,


Is this progression  applicable to your system?


Regards

Great idea mate! Seems others are tackling progression issue for this as well. Yours could be a winner so thanks

[buffalowizard]

my 4 tests so far, different progressions though. 


[attachimg=1]


[attachimg=2]


[attachimg=3]


[attachimg=4]

Great testing Alberto! You are what all system creators wish for. Your results so far are promising indeed

[buffalowizard]

in 44 can see all so 43 thanks

what u think about what i said? betting against the H/L forming?

Soggett I think it's a nice twist on the basic premise and one that could warrant further inspection. Being a bit of a crazy system nut, I'm busy testing another at the moment but feel free to post any results you achieve

BW

[soggett]

in 44 can see all so 43 thanks

what u think about what i said? betting against the H/L forming?

I'm sorry, my English is rusty
I meant bet after every formation, not wait for 2 in a row, just bet every 3 spins against the last formation repeating
so if we have 111 that's low next we bet dozen 3
if 321 comes its a win and still low so we bet 3 again...
etc
hope i made it clearer

Soggett I think it's a nice twist on the basic premise and one that could warrant further inspection. Being a bit of a crazy system nut, I'm busy testing another at the moment but feel free to post any results you achieve

BW

ok, will do, thanks

[buffalowizard]

Hi soggett

Not waiting for two unique sets was how I played this originally in first post or two. It picked up rapid wins but the likelihood of string of losses increases.

It would be a personal preference

[soggett]

Hi soggett

Not waiting for two unique sets was how I played this originally in first post or two. It picked up rapid wins but the likelihood of string of losses increases.

It would be a personal preference

Oh, ok
what do you think of this:
since 222 is a loss what ever we bet, maybe we should bet H/L dozen plus the second dozen?
so it would be a 2 dozen bet
111 - low so bet high + 2 dozen
we bet 1 + 3 for 3 spins
thats one idea that poped up in my mind

you gave me a lot of thinking, I'm brainstorming ever since I read this topic so sorry if Im a little irritating or annoying

I tested a couple of hundered spins betting back to back - after H bet L and after L bet H
with your 1,1,2,3,4,6,9,14,21 - a total of 61 unit I am yet to see a loss, only gain
a loss will eventually accure when a dozen sleeps for 12+ spins (if its 1 or 3 dozen, if dozen 2 sleeps we rake in money  )

will test more

[atlantis]

Did a quick test on some wiesbaden numbers. I played the original rules.
+6 in 96 spins. Highest Bet=2.  Was playing 1-1-1-2-2-2-3-3-3... string. up 1 on a loss; back 2 on a win.
A.

[buffalowizard]

Oh, ok
what do you think of this:
since 222 is a loss what ever we bet, maybe we should bet H/L dozen plus the second dozen?
so it would be a 2 dozen bet
111 - low so bet high + 2 dozen
we bet 1 + 3 for 3 spins
that's one idea that poped up in my mind
Atlantis came up with a suggestion very similar and I think it could work indeed.
you gave me a lot of thinking, I'm brainstorming ever since I read this topic so sorry if I'm a little irritating or annoying
Not irritating I'm glad you like the method mate. We're all here to try and make things even better and stronger

I tested a couple of hundered spins betting back to back - after H bet L and after L bet H
with your 1,1,2,3,4,6,9,14,21 - a total of 61 unit I am yet to see a loss, only gain
a loss will eventually accure when a dozen sleeps for 12+ spins (if its 1 or 3 dozen, if dozen 2 sleeps we rake in money  )

will test more

Keep up the good work. People have made so many good ideas and additions that it is up rotor which you choose to take on

[buffalowizard]

Did a quick test on some wiesbaden numbers. I played the original rules.
+6 in 96 spins. Highest Bet=2.  Was playing 1-1-1-2-2-2-3-3-3... string. up 1 on a loss; back 2 on a win.
A.

Thanks for chipping in Atlantis the master tester. Like the progression by the way