Doz/Col flat bets

[Master_of_pockets]

in my testing it never went more of 5 losses in a row....2 times only went to 5 and all the others above that.

If this helps you in any way...use it.

[Carsch]

Yep, that can help..........or wait after 2 losses, and if another sleeper shows up on the next spin, go for the kill  on the next 2 spins.

[Drazen]

I have tested this system some time ago. Actualy i still have on PC 60 sessions of wiesbaden tested with this bet.

It works realy interesting most of the time, but can catch unpleasnt losing waves as everything. It is not holy schmoly i am afraid.

Why this should have merit? I hope you all see it.

What we are doing here is betting against perfect state. (all 3 different dozens/col in a row)

Because we have 6 different combinations of those, and 12 combinations of other states + green goblin of course

We are losing on 6 states and winning on 12 

I tested it with 2+ 1- progression

Enjoy!

Cheers

Drazen

[Turner]

Average win: 8u. per 100 spins (if playing both Doz & Col)

Thanks for the read Carsch, I do like a good read!

To be honest, the only bit I really dont get is the above. "8u per 100 spins?"

I go to a casino in my car. I must have a bit of dosh to have a car. I have "£50 for the losing of" in my wallet, so thats expendable income. I sit at table one for 4 hours. I see 7 different croupiers.

For 8 U.

I dont get it.

[Drazen]

Ok ok i am in the good mood today. Slowely but i think steadily letting my roots on the dark side  So in some future time systems should be matter of past  lol

There is a thread from mr. ego called "Reduce bets with same probability" I belive you know what am i talking about because some of you were mocking with it. Shame on you!

Well you see, now could be good to stop mocking and think about it...

Well well well, is there a way we could have same thing, but without placing 2 chips to won 1 in this case??



Cheers

Drazen

[Turner]

Ok ok i am in the good mood today. Slowely but i think steadily letting my roots on the dark side  So in some future time systems should be matter of past  LoL

There is a thread from mr. ego called "Reduce bets with same probability" I belive you know what am i talking about because some of you were mocking with it. Shame on you!

Well you see, now could be good to stop mocking and think about it...

Well well well, is there a way we could have same thing, but without placing 2 chips to won 1 in this case??



Cheers

Drazen

You look quite sane on the photograph

[amk]

As do you turnerfeck

[Drazen]

You look quite sane on the photograph

Thanks

But my humble opinion is that one way or another, altogether, to succeed in this game you have to be be fanatic and obsessive to such extent that borders with insanity.

After all it is devils game isnt it? How far you have to go across the hell and get devil for his ....  ?

LoL

Cheers

Drazen

[amk]

I think that numbers can only be divine Draze ( don't mean that to sound serious   Its amazing to think all the angles of this game were devised before computers. Random has limits but roulette seems to fluctuate just within those at every turn. However, there are ways to prosper I believe.

[Turner]

As do you turnerfeck

I thought i was for a while with all this....but sometimes or other you have to stick your flag in the soil and say "Ive analised everything, and I will do this"

If you try to maintain everything and every idea, you become the dog chasing its tail.

There are definate camps in the study of roulette. EC, matrix, long progressions, trends and sector bets. I Think your one or the other.
I think its best to decide what you believe works and stick with it.
You cant do all of them

My flag is to look at short term trends. repeats for a few spins, not repeats for 16 spins with some "this isnt working is it" progression.

Im almost certainly with the "flat betters"

Someone said in here "if it needs a progression it hasnt worked." Im agreeing with that.

Thats it for now.

Turner

[Turner]

I hijacked your post Carsch....sorry...back to topic!!!

[amk]

My bad to Carsch!

My conclusion is that there are indeed players prospering with roulette for many years. Must you formulate a game plan, yes. Will everyone succeed, no.

[Drazen]

I think that numbers can only be divine Draze ( don't mean that to sound serious   Its amazing to think all the angles of this game were devised before computers. Random has limits but roulette seems to fluctuate just within those at every turn. However, there are ways to prosper I believe.

MY friend roulette is mathematical game and systems can only use mathematics/statistics to beat it. Because of negative expectancy all will fail on zilion of spins.

Here is nothing else in matter. As i said. Reduce bets with same probability. Nothing spectacular, nothing voodoo as mr. TCS would said LoL

I didn't do anything special, epochal or incredible.

i just engaged my gray cells and connected black dots that some very knowledable people left here.

The ones that are leaving only dot in first post of the thread and been mocked for that, but they are the one who are mocking in a way...

And this is just one example. You have many of them on forum to create decent bet. You need also to engage good MM to be fully operated.

Cheers

Drazen

[Kattila]

Hi Carsch, give it one try this way( if you wish of course).


[reveal]

14
26     LW strategy to apply
14     When hit L stop and wait
32     one virtual W, after new trigger
24     bet again using if necesary the
29     next progression level
17     Progression Leveller 1/1, 2/2, 4/4
34     and stay on 4/4 until in plus,
18     when bank in plus reset to  1unit
18     Have your own target and stop lose.
30
35
9
14  312, bet 12, bet 1u (1/1)
1   w
24
0
19
22
29
8   231, bet 31
29  w
29
36
4
29
30
3
1
11
15
36  123, bet 23
35  w
26
9
5
26
22  132 , bet 32
4   L, stop wait virtual w
14
13
35
28
35
10
16   312, bet virtual 12
3   w virtual
7
32
2
18  312, bet 12, bet 2/2
21  w real
35
9   231, bet 31, bet 2/2
25  w  now reset to 1/1 next game
15  132, bet 32, bet 1/1
35  w
34
22
21
6
23
10
30  213, bet 13, bet 1/1
27  w
33
24
21
19
15
14
19
29
34
28
13
16
14
27
1   231, bet 31
25  w
26
10
26
32
10
8
1
21
4
7
21
1
23
34   123, bet 23
29  w
19
18
33
20
1   321, bet 21
4   w
27
3
30
17   132, bet 32
5   L stop
5
32
19   132, bet virtual 32
31  w  virtual
10  231, bet real 31, bet 2/2
35  w
8
15  312, bet 12, bet 2/2
11  w  reset to 1unit
16
29  123, bet 23
20  w
5   321, bet 21
7   w
26
22  132, bet 32
10  L stop
2
35
20   132, bet virtual 32
24  w virt.
6
29  213, bet real 13, bet 2/2
7   w
11
2
5
3
30
18   132, bet 32
28  w  reset to  1unit
26
23
3   321, bet 21
13  w
6
20
11
10
12
26 
17  132, bet 32
3   L stop
31  213, bet virt. 13
30  w  virt.
1
13   312, bet real 12, bet 2/2
35  L stop
20
22
3
14
12
23
27   123, bet virt. 23
29  w  virt.
3
19   312, bet real 12, bet 4/4
20  w
7
18
27   123, bet 23, 4/4
25  w  reset to 1 unit
6
31
24   132, bet 32
36  w
7       
30......so on.....
10
1
31




[/reveal]

[amk]

My bad again Carsch..

Draze could send the link for "Reduce bets with same probability", can't find it.