SCOOBY"S "KNOCKOUT" SYSTEM

[ScoobyDoo]

@Soggett


Yes, you have it right in your last post. Also, those are about the same results as I get.


In regards to the longest winning and losing streak......I don't keep track of that. I am only interested in having a a positive amount of units won at the end of the 20 spins.

[ScoobyDoo]

@Robeenhuut


I have no probs if someone says they didn't have good results but only if they can show that they followed the rules completely with some example of their play. It's easy to not fully play it correctly, get bad results and then state that it doesn't work.


If it doesn't work for you, then it doesn't work for you....but make 100% sure you are playing correctly before making such statements.

[soggett]

@Soggett


Yes, you have it right in your last post. Also, those are about the same results as I get.


In regards to the longest winning and losing streak......I don't keep track of that. I am only interested in having a a positive amount of units won at the end of the 20 spins.

Ok, thanks
I did some more testing and I found a triple L and 4 L in a row so a thats a loss.
But overall positive. The question is will it be overall in plus
I think so
And like you said - "I am only interested in having a a positive amount of units won at the end of the 20 spins." I think so too 
The killer of this system is when dozens change wthout a repeat  1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3...

[warrior]

Recently we have a dangerous trend here.  Everybody that does some testing n reports negative results is accused of having some kind of bias or agenda.  MOP is a special case.  I understand that he irritated some people by having sort of a bad attitude but he does some testing here n i don't have any reason 2 doubt his numbers. So if d system is easy 2 understand n there is no doubt that we play it according 2 d rules we should pay attention 2 any criticism n not dismiss it as without any merit.

I agree on what your saying,but tell us why it doesnt work and dont just say this is terrible system .

[ScoobyDoo]

One more issue I would like to bring up. I deem this method of play to be a semi-hit-and-run method. Playing it for extended periods of time and spins is something I don't recommend and therefore I don't take responsibility for the method not performing as I described under those conditions.


If you follow the rules to the letter, you will have similar results as I mentioned earlier

[ScoobyDoo]

Remember.....you are only playing a set of dozens as long as they are hitting. As soon as you have a loss, stop betting on that set and look for a different set to bet on that has at least two hits in a row. After a loss of a bet, you are increasing your bet on the next betting opportunity. When you get a win, drop back down to your starting bet level.

[TwoCatSam]

OK...............

That tracker that VLS wrote works perfectly with this system

Coupled with Lanky's six point divisor, this method would be hard to beat.

Trying it at BV now.

Sam

[malcop]

OK...............

That tracker that VLS wrote works perfectly with this system

Coupled with Lanky's six point divisor, this method would be hard to beat.

Trying it at BV now.

Sam

for those intrested, I have asked if he could update the the tracker to track the colulmns also, and have a button for zero.  I will put the request in over at roulettesoftware.cc tonight.

Here is a thought about the zero, on either side of we have 26 & 32, which is Dozen 3 & Colulmn 2, so why not just put a zero down as 3 for dozens or 2 for colulmns, I tried this over william hill live dealer, and recorded zero as 3.

Thanks

malcop

[TwoCatSam]

Let's knot knock Ophis.  As he said, he was working way below scale to make that bot.

On another note...........

Here's a shot of the actual VLS tracker as I'm using it at BV.  I have gotten most every w in the middle row.

The divisor should be looked into if you want to win.

My lil' ol' opinion.

TwoCats

[ScoobyDoo]

It seems pretty pathetic that you guys have wasted 2 pages talking about everything under the sun, none of which has anything to do with this method of play.


If none of you are willing to actually test this method to see if it has any merit, then what is the point of anyone posting new ideas? Sheeeeeesh!


Either get back on topic or I will close this topic for good. This is B.S.!!!!!

[haloBing]

Scooby
don't close it, just delete posts which have nothing to do with the topic

[TwoCatSam]

Scooby

Clean up the thread!

I'm playing it for real money.

And winning......

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Guys

This is just like anything else--it runs one way then the other.  Watch your Lw register.  When the Ls start coming frequently, bet against w.  This is straight out of the VLS Lw Methodology, only better.

Thanks Scooby.

Hang in there!

Sam

[Master_of_pockets]

So TCS are u playing scooby system exactly as he posted or did u change something?

yes scooby please remove the irrelative posts

[ScoobyDoo]

There.....now that I have cut all of the dead branches from the tree, maybe we can get down to some serious testing and examination of this method.


I hope to see your results very soon.


@twocatsam...Cool! You're playing with real money already....you must have had a little faith in it.

[mattymattz]

have tested this idea a bunch and found that it basically hinges on "2 w chops".  If you get a bunch of "hit,hit,miss" it'll kill you.  But as Sam said earlier, Lanky's divisor system would probably hold it's own nicely.

MM