Awakening Streets

[Master_of_pockets]

My contribution. 

there are some gaps in the bettings because zero was hitting and I was not betting until I had 12 numbers without a zero.
In my testing the system revered nicely with a biggest down of -92 chips

[Master_of_pockets]

"""dropped it 4 some reason."""

can we hear the reason?

[Robeenhuut]

"""dropped it 4 some reason."""

can we hear the reason?

Hehe  curiosity killed d cat.  I just did due 2 lack of time not enough testing bk then.
Get d spins here from forum from SML where i usually play on airball n test around 19 sessions of 185 spins each. Playing straight balance  around 1000u in plus  I know its only 4k spins but...

[atlantis]

Master_of_Pockets wrote:

Also guys you can track the method very easily with the RX.... just configure the last 12 spins and open the streets graph...only problem is when a zero comes it can t be out of the calculation of the last 12

Yes that's unfortunate - same with the other tracker that maestro posted.
Still you can use JL's preferred tracker - pencil and paper!

A.

[atlantis]

6 tests today. 4 on past wiesbaden spins, 2 on live autowheel. All have produced handsome + results (including a +37 in 37 spins at SLC)
I am SO happy I rediscovered this gem today. 
Play for real soon...   

[vile]

Awakening Streets
===========

Track 12 real numbers and convert into "streets".

Anyway it means and is vital that you always have an updated list of the last 12 streets to appear in the order they came out... Got that?

.Got it,but what happens with updated list of the last 12 streets,and we got a hit on our targeted street....question;are we excluding our hit street and including 13 th.furthest street in the game now.

[atlantis]

Hi Vile,
Not necessarily, but it depends...
After the hit update the list so you are showing the latest 12 street results. Continue to bet on any qualifying streets; that is any that have hit EXACTLY TWICE in the list of 12. So you disregard any previous results that have fallen out of the list and you are concentrating only on the CURRENT 12 results recorded for each spin of the game. Simply bet the dual hitters only within the updated list.

Say you've got these 12 recorded:
9-4-6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2-11-4  (qualifiers to bet: streets 4 and 9)

Next number is 26B

That is street 9 so we update the list to:
4-6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2-11-4-9 (qualifiers to bet: streets 4 and 9)

Next number is 14R

That is street 5 so we update the list to:
6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2-11-4-9-5 (qualifiers to bet: streets 5 and 9)

Street 11 does not qualify yet as it is shown hitting 3 times and we only bet dual hitting streets within the 12 spin window of consideration.

Cheers,
Atlantis.

[Master_of_pockets]

""Street 11 does not qualify yet as it is shown hitting 3 times and we only bet dual hitting streets within the 12 spin window of consideration.""


I can t agree with this.

In my testings most of the times the new recoups were made because some streets t hit more than 2 times....3,4 even 5 times.

[atlantis]

""Street 11 does not qualify yet as it is shown hitting 3 times and we only bet dual hitting streets within the 12 spin window of consideration.""


I can t agree with this.

In my testings most of the times the new recoups were made because some streets t hit more than 2 times....3,4 even 5 times.

I take your point - but that does not always happen, MOP...

Say we joined that street list I showed in the previous post a little earlier we might have the situation:
10-7-9-4-6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2  (qualifiers to bet: streets 9 and 11)

Next number is 33B (that's our 3rd 11 from the previous post list turning up)

So we DO or WOULD in fact have gotten a win on street 11 AT THAT POINT! And the list becomes:

7-9-4-6-9-1-3-11-11-5-2-11  (qualifiers to bet: street 9)
And as you have seen in the other post, MOP, the 9 street is going to hit for us in a couple of spins - another welcome win...

But of course you are free to play it as you see fit.

A.

[atlantis]

Master_of_Pockets wrote:

They are 2 def methods....the one u mentioned is based only on sleepers ,while Atlantis is based on both sleepers and repeaters.

MOP is right with that. 

A.

[Master_of_pockets]

I tested with ur way atlantis...betting ONLY on the 2ice hit streets.

It couldn t recover in 182 spins and left a loss of -73 chips....a lot of streets hit 3-4 times....

sure this doesn t mean that my way is better than urs or the opposite,,,,i am just saying the expiriences from my testings

[atlantis]

With this system, as with Profit Trickler, I would play using the JL methodology, (hee hee) - hit and run. I can see it as a fun system for small stakes and not go in too heavy - there are bets on most spins - you're not playing lots of chips - stick to flatbetting - easy to play and understand once you get the hang of the tracking etc..
That's what I'll be doing and I'm reasonably confident I'll know when to stop... Reckon I can win with this most times but would not play rng - just LIVE dealer or LIVE autospin or as sniper is doing at REAL casino.

Regards,
A.

[atlantis]

I tested with your way atlantis...betting ONLY on the 2ice hit streets.

It couldn t recover in 182 spins and left a loss of -73 chips....a lot of streets hit 3-4 times....

sure this doesn't mean that my way is better than urs or the opposite,,,,i am just saying the expiriences from my testings

If it is the case that certain streets are hitting 3-4 times in the current string of 12 then the system will automatically be indicating less qualifiers and therefore reducing the # of bets to be made. There can be times when no bets are placed at all in such a scenario as that... MOP may have had a bad session. I personally would have ended before that kind of loss. I hate to use the dreaded phrase: "It works for me."
Anyhow, thanks for testing.

A.

[atlantis]

Here is example in RX-style for Wiesbaden yesterday 30 Jun 2012, Table #2

1   4   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
2   33   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
3   34   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
4   8   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
5   36   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
6   29   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
7   6   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
8   12   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
9   7   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
10   10   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
11   5   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
12   33   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   **12 numbers tracked here**
13   8   Bet   4   12   -4   8   508   "1 : (7-9),(10-12),(31-33),(34-36)"
14   20   Bet   4   0   -4   -4   504   "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(31-33),(34-36)"
15   36   Bet   3   12   -3   9   513   "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
16   9   Bet   3   0   -3   -3   510   "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
17   11   Bet   3   12   -3   9   519   "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
18   3   Bet   1   0   -1   -1   518   1 : (4-6)
19   1   Bet   1   0   -1   -1   517   1 : (4-6)
20   14   Bet   1   0   -1   -1   516   1 : (1-3)
21   26   Bet   2   0   -2   -2   514   "1 : (1-3),(10-12)"
22   28   Bet   3   0   -3   -3   511   "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(10-12)"
23   31   Bet   2   0   -2   -2   509   "1 : (1-3),(7-9)"
24   29   Bet   3   0   -3   -3   506   "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(31-33)"
25   1   Bet   3   12   -3   9   515   "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(28-30)"
26   16   Bet   1   0   -1   -1   514   1 : (28-30)
27   30   Bet   1   12   -1   11   525   1 : (28-30)

27 spins: Tracked 12 spins then +25 in 15 spins. (but could have quit after +8 on first bet)

A.

[Robeenhuut]

Here is example in RX-style for Wiesbaden yesterday 30 Jun 2012, Table #2

1   4   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
2   33   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
3   34   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
4   8   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
5   36   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
6   29   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
7   6   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
8   12   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
9   7   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
10   10   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
11   5   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   
12   33   No Bet   0   0   0   0   500   **12 numbers tracked here**
13   8   Bet   4   12   -4   8   508   "1 : (7-9),(10-12),(31-33),(34-36)"
14   20   Bet   4   0   -4   -4   504   "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(31-33),(34-36)"
15   36   Bet   3   12   -3   9   513   "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
16   9   Bet   3   0   -3   -3   510   "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
17   11   Bet   3   12   -3   9   519   "1 : (4-6),(10-12),(34-36)"
18   3   Bet   1   0   -1   -1   518   1 : (4-6)
19   1   Bet   1   0   -1   -1   517   1 : (4-6)
20   14   Bet   1   0   -1   -1   516   1 : (1-3)
21   26   Bet   2   0   -2   -2   514   "1 : (1-3),(10-12)"
22   28   Bet   3   0   -3   -3   511   "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(10-12)"
23   31   Bet   2   0   -2   -2   509   "1 : (1-3),(7-9)"
24   29   Bet   3   0   -3   -3   506   "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(31-33)"
25   1   Bet   3   12   -3   9   515   "1 : (1-3),(7-9),(28-30)"
26   16   Bet   1   0   -1   -1   514   1 : (28-30)
27   30   Bet   1   12   -1   11   525   1 : (28-30)

27 spins: Tracked 12 spins then +25 in 15 spins. (but could have quit after +8 on first bet)

A.

Nice run Atlantis.  I would quit as well after a first hit.  Funny thing that playing my system i would get also a early win after 11 hit in spin 17.  It completed 4th street (10,12 hit b4) 
I would bet on missing number in 3rd n 12th street and also in 2nd street where i would get an additional win after 5 hit in spin 11 (4,6 hit b4). I would probably shut down after that but f i kept betting 30 hit on spin 27 4 another win completing street 10 after 28 n 29 hit b4.
Maybe we should combine both methods   

Regards