9 LIVES

[beretta28]

I apologize wiyh Warrior because I' m telling always the same"_ALREADY TESTED BY ME A FEW YEARS AGO!"
It doesn't work.
Do you really think that the last four outcomes can influence the next spin(s)?
I've tried all systems on lines.


The best one with a statistical basis was:after four different lines in the last four spins,I bet that in the next five spins,at least ONE of the lines missing will hit.(law of periodicity of lines outcomes)


So after 4 different lines you have to play for 5 spins,progression 1,1,2,3,4  on the 2 missing lines.


This system resisted almost 8000 spins,then I lose all my bkr and the previou wins.
Even the law of periodicity of outcomes has its big exceptions that kill you!


All similar systems must be tested(if flat bet) at least 50 000 spins,(if progressions) at least 500000 spins.
I used to test everything on 1 million spins for well understanding stability,deviation,balance etc
1500 spins you mention are a joke!

[Robeenhuut]

Hola Beretta

I wonder how u came up with 50000 or 500000 spins figure?. Warrior knows of course that 1.5k is not enough. Its just one of many ideas right now on d forum. And about consecutive losses betting on 3 unique lines - i saw 11. And i was betting this game with 1,2,4,8 Marty. Luckily i started after 8 L's thinking that it was a sure thing n won on a last bet.  I guess sometimes u never learn. 6 or 7 L's happen quite often. 1up n 1down progression can keep u in d game but u never know when such a streak might come. 2 streaks in a short succession will wipe u out.

Regards

[beretta28]

Robeenhuut


I'm afraid you have big experience in roulette,but poor knowledge in math.
With flat bet,even with a very positive deviation in your favour,at 25000 spins you lose(Zero tax).
It's a simple calculation that you can make youself or if you are not able to do it, you find in any serious book dealing with roulette.
See for example:Marcel Boll -La roulette (20â,¬).
I consider 50 thousands spins,because I want to check a STD very rare,exceptional but that a gambler out of 1000 can ,may be, see.


With progesssion is more complicated the calculation,because it depends on the type of progression(very risky,strong or very soft).
At 500000 spins whatever is the progression,no hope.But a system with progression could be tested at 1000000 spins in order to be sure about conclusions.
I have seen systems that resist at 50000 spins(flat bet) or 500000 spins(progressions) but they are not playable(huge bkr,big negative balance,max bet of the table...)

[vile]

There is a reason why i think this can work, not all 6 lines show every time,they repeat the magority of the time that's why the 4 unique is important .

--Have posted something similar the other day Warrior,and am well acquaint with the bet,was working
on it for long until it didn't hit 10 and 11 times losing in the row...can go for months,year but the devil will strike....

--this bet is much safer and profitable flat bet,w/l retrack new 4 unique lines.....in the rolling fashion
  could explode

[warrior]

--Have posted something similar the other day Warrior,and am well acquaint with the bet,was working
on it for long until it didn't hit 10 and 11 times losing in the row...can go for months,year but the devil will strike....

--this bet is much safer and profitable flat bet,w/l retrack new 4 unique lines.....in the rolling fashion
  could explode

Vile so you have seen 10 11 in a row playing the way i postsed the system?

[Master_of_pockets]

he saw it afterwards...because he never test enough. LoL
if a system win in 300 spins its the holy moly for him
and if someone is makinf tests in more than 300 spins ,then this person isn t playing roulette for real.
and 18.000 spins for him is zillion spins!

[warrior]

I apologize wiyh Warrior because I' m telling always the same"_ALREADY TESTED BY ME A FEW YEARS AGO!"
It doesn't work.
Do you really think that the last four outcomes can influence the next spin(s)?
I've tried all systems on lines.


The best one with a statistical basis was:after four different lines in the last four spins,I bet that in the next five spins,at least ONE of the lines missing will hit.(law of periodicity of lines outcomes)


So after 4 different lines you have to play for 5 spins,progression 1,1,2,3,4  on the 2 missing lines.


This system resisted almost 8000 spins,then I lose all my bkr and the previou wins.
Even the law of periodicity of outcomes has its big exceptions that kill you!


All similar systems must be tested(if flat bet) at least 50 000 spins,(if progressions) at least 500000 spins.
I used to test everything on 1 million spins for well understanding stability,deviation,balance etc
1500 spins you mention are a joke!
[/quote   

First of its 1500 bets placed not spins, to test something for 50000 is useless ,flat betting in a negative exp.game hmmm,and i also have tested systems on lines and they hold up and then fail this is not new for me after 10 years, like i said to mop long term for me means RIGHT NOW, ihave lots of controll over my self i no what this game can do and I'm very carefull ,i no when to leave and i never have lost thousands over this game,but its better than a slot machine im not in roulette to make a living.

[vile]

Vile so you have seen 10 11 in a row playing the way i postsed the system?

Yes Warrior.And to you barking mop....wau.wau.don't mention
my name any more as wasn't talking to you..... as enough is enough.
You better get this message to your head for ever.

[warrior]

Vile when your bets lose in roulette do you react, if no then do not react to mop, you give him power every time you do, mop leave the old guy alone

[warrior]

Anyways back to this bet selection, im at 2000 placed bets not spins ,the longest 6 in a row .

[Master_of_pockets]

I am just wandering if he will ever learn 

I just want to alter the phrase "You can t teach an old dog new tricks" to "You CAN teach on old dog new tricks" 

warrior I told u that i faced a session with 8 losses in a row
I am also reminding you that if a bet selection can t win flat betting , then it can t with progression too

[Robeenhuut]

Hola Warrior

R u serious? U did not see more than 6 losses in a row?. Let me get this straight. U bet on 3 unique lines after 4 unique lines hit n after loss u bet on a new set of 3 unique lines?  I do not remember correctly but it happened in 2nd or 3rd set of my 185 spins sets from SMLive live wheel.
And 11 losses i saw myself short time ago.  Anyway besides that i do not see anything wrong with that.  U can recover from 6 losses using progression, playing flat not much risk.

Regards

[warrior]

Hola Warrior

R u serious? U did not see more than 6 losses in a row?. Let me get this straight. U bet on 3 unique lines after 4 unique lines hit n after loss u bet on a new set of 3 unique lines?  I do not remember correctly but it happened in 2nd or 3rd set of my 185 spins sets from SMLive live wheel.
And 11 losses i saw myself short time ago.  Anyway besides that i do not see anything wrong with that.  You can recover from 6 losses using progression, playing flat not much risk.

Regards

No Rrob 4 unique line bet on the last 3 if you lose stay on those 3,only when you win re evaluate the last 4 if there unique bet the last 3.

[warrior]

I am just wandering if he will ever learn 

I just want to alter the phrase "You can t teach an old dog new tricks" to "You CAN teach on old dog new tricks" 

warrior I told u that i faced a session with 8 losses in a row
I am also reminding you that if a bet selection can t win flat betting , then it can t with progression too

8 but not 9 lives,take 2 away from those 8 its only 6 in a row hint hint.

[Robeenhuut]

No Rrob 4 unique line bet on the last 3 if you lose stay on those 3,only when you win re evaluate the last 4 if there unique bet the last 3.

Sorry Warrior then  I did not read rules properly. Mea culpa. I thought that they were rolling lines.