Voyager System - To boldly go...

[buffalowizard]

Thanks for the testing George!
I'm going to continue posting results and see if others think its worth continuing with this idea. Would be nice to hear others findings and their respective tweaks

BW

[buffalowizard]

Some more testing from Vittoriosa actuals this time:


I like GLC's first progression he posted for his test...It would be nice to know
how this sample would have ended up.

+10 using Fibonacci

8   1   
 
33  4


29  4


31  4 L

20  3 W


11  2


34  4


10  2


24  3 W


25  3


28  4


4   1


31  4


32  4 L


14  2 W


20  3


4   1


33  4


10  2


34  4


14  2 L


26  3 W


32  4


33  4


1   1


33  4 L


32  4 L


36  4 L RETRACK


8   1


3   1


23  3


30  4 W


14  2


36  4


32  4


18  2 L


34  4 L


12  2 L RETRACK


15  2


3   1


22  3


6   1


19  3 L


12  2 W


14  2


27  3


7   1


36  4


27  3


2   1


18  2


13  2


9   1 L


18  2 L


21  3 W


7   1


34  4


33  4


12  2 W


1   1


22  3


17  2


32  4


32  4


0   L


19  3 W


14  2


25  3


8   1


21  3


16  2 W


25  3


15  2


16  2


30  4 W


30  4


25  3


31  4


15  2 W


31  4


14  2


34  4


23  3 W


22  3


13  2


23  3


3   1 W


28  4


16  2


33  4


8   1 W


15  2


22  3


23  3


15  2 L


3   1 W


14  2


13  2


17  2


13  2


9   1


18  2 L


2   1 L


32  4 W


15  2


20  3


29  4


8   1


35  4


6   1 L

19  3 W


10  2


0   RETRACK


23  3


23  3


7   1


28  4 W


0


13  2


3   1


14  2


15  2 L


10  2 L


25  3 W


23  3


8   1


28  4


5   1


28  4 L


33  4 L


1   1 L RETRACK


3   1


0   RETRACK


6   1


24  3


31  4


13  2


20  3


17  2


5   1


32  4


9   1


3   1 L


33  4 L


23  3 W


31  4


2   1


3   1


16  2 W


3   1


18  2


19  3


0   RETRACK


36  4


29  4


36  4


14  2


16  2 L


13  2 L


24  3 W


24  3


29  4


15  2


25  3


14  2


16  2 L


11  2 L


34  4 W


25  3


35  4


33  4


36  4 L


12  2 W


3   1


17  2


6   1


9   1 L


5   1 L


3   1 L RETRACK


8   1


15  2


10  2


32  4 W


1   1


27  3


6   1


18  2 W

[buffalowizard]

And continuing on.... max 4 loss in a row here

+9 using Fibonacci


10 

8   


8   


28   W


31 


29 


8   


11   W


4   


32 


29


27   W


34


22


0


19


17


9


25


30


2


6


36   L


14   W


26


35


20


21   L


35   L


4    W


10


35


22


18


14


16   L


21   L


26   L


25


29


30


22   L


7    W


32


14


8


35


30


16   W


32


18


25


11


23   L


30   W


13


5


20


13


7


31


28


19   W


3


26


15


19


2    W


3


0


14


26


2


26


35   W


14


29


29


3    W


19


13


33


21


19


15   W


33


13


35


1    W


34


7


30


6    L


3    L


26   W

[Kattila]

Hi BW,
keep on the good work !
maybe better if bet only on 9 numbers .

cheers

[buffalowizard]

Hi BW,
keep on the good work !
maybe better if bet only on 9 numbers .

cheers

Thanks Kat,


I have tried betting on one sector only, and finding repeating sectors in old forum...with pretty decent results...you once suggested a progression I believe.


Still testing out this 2 sector bet first


BW

[Stepkevh]

and on what do you bet exactly ?

lines or separate numbers ?

i bet on all the separate numbers, always +18 on a win :-)

or you can take 3u /line to get the same bet.

[buffalowizard]

Further testing going on.


+7 Fibo

[reveal]


30   


11


18


34   L

7    W


0


29


7


24


17


32


18


20   W


20


32


26


27   L


3    W


29


12


31


3    W


15


14


31


1    W


13


31


4


28


13   W


35


6


18


0    RETRACK


3


21


16


9


31


16


2


27


18


14


21    L


32    W


21


31


35


34    L


10    W


15


16


29


8     W


12


16


0     RETRACK


26


7


11


32


2


28


21    W


3


16


29


6


32


9     L


17    W


25


23


20


4


4     L


21    L


15    W


25


35


8


18


19


24


20    L


18    L


14    L


16


6


26


21


19    L


27    L


28    W


27


26


20


15


27    L


0     L


32    W


26


35


31


5     W


5


27


6

12    W
[/reveal]

[buffalowizard]

And some more besides:


Finishing on +13.


Still holding up. I know it's a pathetic amount of spins so far, and all systems seem to do well at first (should that be a theorum, because it's always the case!)


Quite a few three losses at least but comes back nicely. haven't had to bet beyond 13 units yet...yet!






[reveal]

30


30


30


2


30    L

34    L


33    L


34


20


29


14    W


8


31


19


29


28    L


9     W


15


24


24


17    L


22    L


9     W


22


33


10


22


27


16    L


14    L


13    L


34


24


1


11


29


13


3     W


32


9


5


15    W


12


20


1


6


5     L


6     L


11    W


15


31


22


4


4


36    W


34


32


1


16    W


7


28


19


22


18    W


20


25


12


22    L


11    L   


15    L


10


7


26


11


28    W


24


1


11


33


8


25


21


11    W


4


32


1


10    W


19


13


5


30


18


36


1     W


14


12


32


25    W


4


23


1


9     L


10    W


7


18


28


28


7     W


24


16


13


13    L


3     W


30


23


21


17    W


6


4


24


16    W


27


0


3


12


36


23


13


34


33


31    L


30    L


17    L


6


24


34


22


12    W


25


8


18


6


18    L


3     L


26    W


15


15


18


28


36    L


33    L


7     W


1


26


33


28


30    L


26    L


6     W


15


35


10


35    L


23    W


26


21


15


2     W


16


33


28


20    W


32


36


10


35    L


16    L


11    L


23


29


33


15    W


34


1


21


9


15    W
[/reveal]

[GLC]

I just realized that Walley was pointing out that I didn't stop betting after 3 losses and then pick up again on the next signal.  Also I need to point out that my numbers need to be multiplied by 6 since each bet is really 6 streets. 

Sorry for any confusion.

GLC

[Wally Gator]

500 B & M spins, real wheel, real casino
Double 0 wheel
Played with the trend and against the trend (BW plays against the trend)


Don't know why it works, but results are results ....

[buffalowizard]

Hey Mr Gator,

Thanks for testing this out. You were using a +1/-1 progression right? Seemed to work ok. Good job!

Will do some more myself later on

[Wally Gator]

You were using a +1/-1 progression right?

Yes.


I'll do a bit more testing to see where this goes ....

[buffalowizard]

A tough session this one..,.Wally, could you please tell me what this would have ended up doing +1/-1?


Thanks


BW

[reveal]



2


16


31


34


1     W


2


31


15


24


25


14    L 


21    L 


23    L 


30


2


4


1     L 


0     L 


7     L 


36


33


32


13


35    L 


24    W 


30


18


26


23


33    W


30


14


18


2     W


28


11


8


20


8


29    W


22


12


15


28    W


24


0


17


17


1


10    L


13    L


34    W


22


3


23


21    L


13    W


23


32


14


10


27    W


0


23


20


7


8     L


13    W


1


6


3


30


27    W


22


5


28


18


29


3     W


32


28


14


34    L


28    L


33    L


2


10


16


8     L


34    W


19


3


30


34


28    L


4     L


22    W


30


11


3


2


35    W


7


35


22


24


16    W


36


15


7


6


26    W


17


23


13


25    L


20    L


32    W


3


29


3


27    W


31


6


7


35    L


18    W


35


33


33


4


23    W


27


28


35


13    W


0


0


26


5


25


34    W


[/reveal]

[Wally Gator]

A tough session this one..,.Wally, could you please tell me what this would have ended up doing +1/-1?

Here you go.  When playing against the trend, I played to 4 losses and reset (not the progression, just the sequence).


Playing both simultaneously could possibly be a good option.

[buffalowizard]

Good stuff Wally,


So playing to 4 losses recovered nicely on playing against the trend.


Interesting now to see how many 4 losses there are


Playing simultaneous would make my brain fry but good luck to those willing~!


Cheers


BW