Illuminati

[warrior]

Thanks N1CKYYY,Rob the only progression i no is the rise and fall by L HOLLOWAY,it can get us out of the slumps.

[TwoCatSam]

Hello

If I'm reading right, the largest draw down was about 65 units.  Is that excessive?

So, N1CKYYY, you are using a modified Fibo?  Care to explain?  Do you mean modified from ECs to dozens?

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Thanks N1CKYYY,Rob the only progression i no is the rise and fall by L HOLLOWAY,it can get us out of the slumps.

Where could one find this progression?

Sam

[Robeenhuut]

Thanks N1CKYYY,Rob the only progression i no is the rise and fall by L HOLLOWAY,it can get us out of the slumps.

Hola Warrior

Prog is of course important but a classical 1Dz prog 112346....is in my opinion good enough but  1u win to 40u loss in 8 steps makes me a bit uncomfortable considering the fact that we can except to go more than 8 steps sooner or later. Should we go longer than 8 steps?  Then in each step you risk at least 20u more to win 1u. I guess thats a perfect scenario to code it and play around with it.

Regards

[N1CKYYY]

Hello

If I'm reading right, the largest draw down was about 65 units.  Is that excessive?

So, N1CKYYY, you are using a modified Fibo?  Care to explain?  Do you mean modified from ECs to dozens?

Sam

Well the title is a little misleading. The progression is not modified. Just the way we bet is based on rules that are explained in the begining of the thread.

the progression is

0.01, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.08, 0.13, and so on

Fn+1 = Fn-1 + Fn

[warrior]

Where could one find this progression?

Sam

I have the book but i can post here for you.

[warrior]

Well the title is a little misleading. The progression is not modified. Just the way we bet is based on rules that are explained in the begining of the thread.

the progression is

0.01, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.08, 0.13, and so on

Fn+1 = Fn-1 + Fn

The title is not important,  ,its like a boat to get you to the other side of the lake.
but the results are pretty good.

[warrior]

Hola Warrior

Prog is of course important but a classical 1Dz prog 112346....is in my opinion good enough but  1u win to 40u loss in 8 steps makes me a bit uncomfortable considering the fact that we can except to go more than 8 steps sooner or later. Should we go longer than 8 steps?  Then in each step you risk at least 20u more to win 1u. I guess that's a perfect scenario to code it and play around with it.

Regards

Thats gambling nothing is for sure.

[TwoCatSam]

I have the book but i can post here for you.

I'd appreciate knowing the name of the book and the author.  I'll buy it, maybe.

Sam

[GLC]

It would be nice to know how many times we had a win on each bet.

Like JL posts.  100 wins on bet #1
                      70 wins on bet #2
                      50 wins on bet #3
                      Etc...

This can be helpful in determining a safer progression.

If we know that 70% of the wins come in the 1st 4 bets, we can use a progression that needs 2 or even 3 wins to fully recover.  This will keep our bets from escalating too quickly and we can be less afraid of a long losing sequence.

[TwoCatSam]

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong but I thought a Fibo was for ECs only.  Does this system not bet on a single dozen?

Where am I going wrong? (Please don't name ALL the places, just on this thread!)

Sam

[amk]

Many thanks warrior and N1CKYYY.

[mattymattz]

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong but I thought a Fibo was for ECs only.  Does this system not bet on a single dozen?

Where am I going wrong? (Please don't name ALL the places, just on this thread!)

Sam

Sam - Fibbo sequence can be used anywhere, just more common on EC's.

MM

[vladir]

Nice system, bad name ^^

[warrior]

I'd appreciate knowing the name of the book and the author.  I'll buy it, maybe.

Sam

Full time gambler .