[Full systems] Re: Linear betting - the wheel and carpet

[Jordan]

I had only posted mt opinion based in my VB expitience and look what is his behavior!I do not think that a member like this should be in here...i am really sorrt about him..

JORDAN please make sure that we never meet not on  your site/ section or ever in live you are a scam in making!!!!!!!!


You know f of vb or the physics or even your holy grail spelling is wrong. Proof me wrong give me 100 spins and never to repeat any of what I'm saying. You'v got you own section stay out of my topic or proof me wrong.

Victor sorry but this guy is killing a good topic. Promising a Holy Grail and not allowing any other idea to be posted. I can proof this to work.

Try to jump from 1 double street with out repeating any of the previous DS in 5 spins.


TCD
 

[VLS]

Hello there.

OK our first issue in between members; let's try to be balanced here.

We ALL as a community have a voice on this.

In this case my best advice is to move posts out of the thread. Reader don't want to read about these things on their topic of study. Let's keep all the topics focused.

In this case, what I propose is this:

- Get the problem posts OUT of the topic and move them to this [the new dissenting] section.
- Have both Twocando and Jordan stand for their points.

No bans are to be issued. I think we all agree this is the very first instance and both have been productive members;  when much, warns should be issued, but not a forum ban.

What do you guys say? What do you propose?

[Jordan]

Victor I did not insylted the twocando member.
I just explained with maths and phisics why a method like that(that has no reason to win)
In my opinion this posts was correct to be posted in that topic because it was 100% on topic and not off
But when I saw that this posts mayby harm the Topic I asked sorry and I didn t post anything with the same spirit!
My next post was to congragulate .the member that won with it.

[VLS]

I want to keep this community balanced.

Both for the poster who is trying to explain his method to do so in peace, as well as the person who want to advice users regarding the method.

In the end we can get something out of this incident, I'm about to open a "Dissenting section" for members to provide their stand on why X or Y system is not optimal.

A single post with a link to the dissenting area is allowed to be posted inside the system's thread. It doesn't mean a full-blown thread hijacking and yet it is placed exactly where the person advicing about the method in question wants it to be seen.

This way we keep things balanced.

[Jordan]

U did it again!
that would be the best of all!!!!

[VLS]

I have marked this topic solved .

If Twocando or someone else wants to reopen this ticket, please advice so right at the thread.



There are two theads now.

Original thread with comments removed:

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=51.0

Spawned thread holding the comments at the dissenting area:

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=75.0

Regards.
Victor